You've lied on your CV. Now what? | Nudge Newsletter


Job Interviews

​Read online​


An old colleague of mine was fired for spending hours at work playing video games.

I always wondered how they'd deal with this dismissal in future job interviews.

Should they admit to the mistake?

Deny it?

Or stay silent?

That's what Donald Ferrin and his colleagues tested in 2007.

102 participants watched a video of a job interview.

In the video, the interviewer raises a problem with the candidate's experience.

A reference said that the candidate had made a mistake filling in a tax form at a previous job due to incompetence.

Ferrin then created three different versions of the video:

  1. The candidate apologises and takes full responsibility
  2. The candidate denies the accusation outright
  3. The candidate says they can't confirm or deny due to confidentiality

Each participant was then asked if they would hire the candidate.

Turns out, apologising worked best.

According to Professor Vanessa Bohns, it's better to say, "Sorry, I made a mistake; it won't happen again," than "It wasn't my fault."

The participants were asked to rate the candidate for perceived integrity:

  • Apologising = 4.98/7
  • Denying = 4.21/7
  • Staying silent = 4.17/7

Willingness to trust them with important tasks:

  • Apologising = 3.57/7
  • Denying = 3.00/7
  • Staying silent = 3.26/7

Willingness to hire them:

  • Apologising = 4.47/7
  • Denying = 3.94/7
  • Staying silent = 3.89/7

Perceived competence:

  • Apologising = 4.55/7
  • Denying = 4.44/7
  • Staying silent = 4.28/7

When it comes to problems with your experience, owning up to it is always better than staying silent.


This study is just one of the 600+ insights in the Nudge Vaults.​

Here's a look inside:

Get access to the Vaults right now →​

Or you can preview your first 50 insights for free →

Cheers,

​Phill​

P.S. This insight comes from this fantastic new book:

¹Ferrin, D. L., Kim, P. H., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T. (2007). Silence speaks volumes: The effectiveness of reticence in comparison to apology and denial for responding to integrity- and competence-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 893–908.

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule.

​Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter
windows-and-doors-front

Handwritten Notes Read online Specsavers turns over £4 billion each year, but the co-founder still spends time writing birthday cards for employees. She says, "It's caring for the people that are at the sharp end, working really hard every day, to make sure that nobody falls through the net." She does it every weekend without fail. It can be 500 cards each week. “If anyone has a baby or someone’s relative dies, I will be writing a card." But why bother? Well, because paradoxically, a...

Mystery Gifts Read online Would you go for this? It’s eufy’s UK page for a mystery gift. You get one of these security cameras for free, picked at random, and the “£499” is just the most it could be worth. Now, I have no idea if anyone is buying this. But I love it because it leverages two wonderful behavioural science principles. Free needs a value Imagine you're offering a free product in your bundle. For example, I bought a reMarkable tablet recently, which came with a free stylus....

Criticised AI mural of Bristol on Bedminster pub wall removed - BBC News

AI Designs Read online A month back, the pub down the road from me erected this mural. It tries to depict the city of Bristol, but it gets a lot wrong. The mural shows a tower from Canada rather than Bristol. There's a bridge that doesn't belong in the city. And even the Banksy looks off. Clearly, it's AI-generated. And local residents hated it. Caroline Maggs told Bristol 24/7 that it "undermines artists' work". The BMC called it disrespectful. Others called it a "slap in the face" to local...