Why this ad sticks in my mind | Nudge Newsletter


Generation Effect

Read online


This ad outside my local opticians sticks in my mind.

At first glance, it's bizzare.

It doesn't promote the business, showcase a promotion, or entice people in.

And yet, I think it's weirdly effective due to the generation effect.

In 1978, researchers¹ asked participants to either read work pairs or generate missing words from cues. For example:

Read condition: hot → cold

Generate condition: hot → c___

Those generating answers consistently remembered more across all memory tests.

In 2020, the study was repeated² with brand names.

Participants were shown ads with brand names containing missing letters, for example, "H_BC."

It was obvious to readers that the bank was HSBC, but by removing one letter, the ad became more engaging.

Shotton, Treharne, and Burnett found that brand names with missing letters were 14% more memorable.

Many ads apply this finding in a literal way.

Like Cancer Research UK.

And American Red Cross.

But my local opticians do something unique.

On average, we blink once every 3 seconds.

So those who walk past this sign will almost certainly blink while reading it.

That blink, rather than being an unconscious action, is now reframed as a conscious engagement.

And rather than ignoring the ad, we're forced to think about it, kicking in the generation effect.

It's a lovely example, with a simple takeaway.

Don't spell it out. Let your audience do some heavy lifting.


The generation effect is one of 85 principles you'll find in the Nudge Vaults.

In fact, Nudge Vaults subscribers can use VaultsGPT to apply this principle to their work:

Get access right now →

Or you can preview your first 50 insights for free

Cheers,

Phill

¹Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(6), 592–604.

²Shotton, R. (2023). The illusion of choice: 16½ psychological biases that influence what we buy. Harriman House.

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule.

Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

The Halo Effect Read online The World Cup is here, and England's kit looks a bit naff. Cole Palmer wearing a shirt that looks 2x too big. The kit seems ill-fitting; it looks far too baggy around the shoulders, and the neck is too wide. If Nike surveyed my opinion for their market research, I'd give it a 1/5. But my opinion could change very soon. Success shifts perception. In 2019, researcher Gerd Nufer¹ asked 3,178 football fans to rank the quality of their club's kits. For the study, six...

Specific Number Bias Read online I stumbled across this Reddit post a few weeks back. Everest surveyors added two feet to their measurement to appear accurate. Rather than listing the exact measurement of 29,000, the British Royal Geographical Society declared Mount Everest's elevation at 29,002. Clearly, the surveyors thought that rounded numbers seem less believable. Something that numerous studies have since proven. Can You Spare 17 Cents? In 1994, Santos, Leve and Pratkanis asked three...

The AI Contradiction Read online I just generated an image in the style of Monet using AI. Have a look, and think about what makes this inferior to a real Monet painting. Made with AI* A few weeks back, X user "SHLOMS" did the same. SHLOM's post on X. 1,300 people responded. Most said this AI art was pure crap.They said it lacked "coherent composition". The colours were an "incoherent muddle". Some said it was "trying too hard". Others called it "obvious AI slop". Replies to "SHLOMS" included...