Why anti-drug ads made more teens try drugs | Nudge Newsletter


Negative Social Proof

Read online


In the early 2000s, communications professor Bob Hornik¹ wanted to see if anti-drug ads worked.

He gathered data on thousands of teenagers. He tracked their exposure to anti-drug ads and their marijuana use over time.

The results?

The ads didn’t reduce drug use. They increased it.

Teenagers who saw the ads were more likely to smoke marijuana.

Why?

Because the ads unintentionally reinforced the idea that drug use was common.

This is called negative social proof.

People look to others to determine what’s normal. The more they hear about something, the more they assume it’s widespread.

Anti-drug campaigns meant to deter use were doing the opposite. They showed that drug use was a big enough problem to require national ads.

Negative social proof examples

1️⃣ To change behaviour, highlight what people should do.

Don't highlight that negative behaviour is commonplace.

At Arizona’s Petrified Forest², a sign warning that many stole wood backfired.

Rather than reducing theft, the sign doubled the amount of theft.

A new sign urging preservation was more effective, reducing theft.

2️⃣ The UK's largest retail bank made the same mistake.

To encourage saving, they advertised how "11.5 million Brits have less than £100 saved".

As we know, that will only encourage negative behaviour.

3️⃣ In the UK, the NHS faces a recurring issue: missed medical appointments.

To tackle this, some managers displayed stats on no-shows.

But research³ found this backfires. Seeing high numbers normalised behaviour.

A simple shift solved it. New signs emphasized that most patients arrive on time. No-shows dropped significantly.

Thanks to Jonah Berger's book for this week's newsletter inspiration.

And a big thanks to today's sponsors!

Sponsored by: The Rundown.ai

Start learning AI in 2025

Everyone talks about AI, but no one has the time to learn it. So, we found the easiest way to learn AI in as little time as possible: The Rundown AI. It's a free AI newsletter that keeps you up-to-date on the latest AI news, and teaches you how to apply it in just 5 minutes a day. Plus, complete the quiz after signing up and they’ll recommend the best AI tools, guides, and courses – tailored to your needs.

Cheers Phill!

P.S. At the time of writing, just six spots are left on the Nudge Unit.

Want me to help you apply behavioural science to your work? Sign up here.

¹Hornik, R., Jacobsohn, L., Orwin, R., Piesse, A., & Kalton, G. (2008). Effects of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign on youths. American Journal of Public Health, 98(12), 2229–2236

²Cialdini, R. B. (2006). Influence: The psychology of persuasion (Revised edition). Harper Business.

³Martin, S. J. (2024). Influence at work: Capture attention, connect with others, convince people to act. The Economist Edge.

⁴Berger, J. (2016). Contagious: Why things catch on. Simon & Schuster.

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule*

Tune into Nudge | Advertise here | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

Give Bonuses Upfront? Read online What would happen if bonuses were paid upfront? Almost every company pays out bonuses AFTER targets are hit. But why don’t companies pay bonuses BEFORE and withdraw the money if targets are missed? I accept that it could be a logistical challenge, but the potential benefits are huge. On page 71 of The Influential Mind, Tali Sharot¹ shares an eye-opening study. One group of teachers were given $4,000 and told that the money would be taken away if their...

Never Lead With Negativity Read online Last week, a student enrolled in the Nudge Unit asked me: Should I show my negative reviews? The answer is yes but with a heavy caveat. Studies show that consumers prefer a 4.8-star rating to a 5-star rating¹. The 4.8 rating feels more believable and trustworthy. So, you'll need to include a few negative reviews. In fact, an analysis of New York Times book reviews found that negative reviews increased sales by 45%² for unknown authors. A poorly reviewed...

Me talking at iMark conference.

Distinct But Not Different Read online Last week, I gave a keynote speech in Reykjavík for the ÍMARK conference. Want me to speak at your event? Email me (I'll give you mates' rates) I spoke about standing out and why marketers are obsessed with differentiation. It all starts with the Von Restorff effect. Distinct images stick in our minds 👇 Distinct items stand out in our minds. Not only are distinct things 30x¹ more memorable, they bend our perception. That's why the heavy metal band Party...