Should you share a weakness upfront (or hide it)? | Nudge Newsletter


Sharing Weaknesses

Read online


In the 1970s, researchers Jones and Gordon¹ from Duke University played people a recording of a man (really a stooge) talking about his life.

During the tape the man explained he had not completed a school semester because he had been caught cheating and had been expelled.

The researchers edited the tape so that:

1️⃣ Half of the participants heard this bombshell toward the beginning

2️⃣ Half of the participants heard it toward the end.

Did the timing of the weakness change perception?

Yes. Dramatically.

According to Richard Wiseman²:

"When the cheating was mentioned toward the start of the tape, the man appeared far more likeable than when it was mentioned toward the end."

There's evidence that this occurs with court cases too.

Lawyers are judged as having a stronger case³ when they acknowledge a weakness in their argument at the start of a trial.

And many smart brands leverage the same bias. They share their weakness upfront.

  • Avis – “We’re No. 2. We try harder.”
  • Marmite – “Love it or hate it.”
  • Buckley’s – “It tastes awful. And it works.”
  • Guinness – “Good things come to those who wait.”
  • Listerine — “The taste you hate. Twice a day.”
  • Stella Artois — “Reassuringly expensive.”
  • KFC — “FCK. We’re sorry.”

So, if you have a weakeness and it's bound to come out.

Don't hide it.

Present it first.


Interested in more marketing ideas?

The fantastic team at Alt Marketing School runs a brilliant newsletter sharing quick marketing wins, campaign deep dives, and tactics you can actually use. It's one of the few marketing emails that consistently teaches something useful.

Subscribe today →


Cheers for reading!

Phill

P.S. I'm publishing my favourite podcast episode of the year on Monday—don't miss it.

¹Jones, E. E., & Gordon, E. M. (1972). Timing of self-disclosure and its effects on personal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 358–365.

²Wiseman, R. (2009). 59 seconds: Think a little, change a lot. Pan Macmillan.

³Williams, K. D., Bourgeois, M. J., & Croyle, R. T. (1993). The effects of stealing thunder in criminal and civil trials. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 597-609.

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule.

Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

Isolation Effect Read online Noah Kagan tested his book cover design by photoshopping the book onto shelves to see what stood out. The green cover isn't different, but it is distinct. In 1933, German researcher Hedwig Von Restorff¹ published a paper on memory and distinctiveness. She gave participants long lists of letter combinations to remember (e.g. JTSW, UCSM, PLST), but among them was a single number sequence: 9125. When participants returned after a distraction task, Hedwig found that...

Social Proof Read online "Window cleaning in progress" I love this board because it remembers something most marketers forget. A real photo taken on a suburban street in Houston. Cialdini proved that we're persuaded by others. In an Arizonan hotel room, he placed two messages on hotel doors designed to convince guests to reuse their towels. “Help us save the environment” = 35% towel reuse. “Most guests reuse their towels” = 44% towel reuse. We're persuaded by others' actions. So, if a...

Associative Learning Read online I'm reading The Expectation Effect. On page 52¹, there's a story that every marketer should read: The surgeon John Noland Mackenzie was among the first to test a negative expectation effect in medicine. Working at Baltimore's Eye, Ear and Throat Charity Hospital in the 1880s, he examined a 32-year-old woman with severe asthma and hay fever. When exposed to pollen, her nose and eyes would run and her throat would itch so badly she felt she must "tear [it] out...