Should you share a weakness upfront (or hide it)? | Nudge Newsletter


Sharing Weaknesses

Read online


In the 1970s, researchers Jones and Gordon¹ from Duke University played people a recording of a man (really a stooge) talking about his life.

During the tape the man explained he had not completed a school semester because he had been caught cheating and had been expelled.

The researchers edited the tape so that:

1️⃣ Half of the participants heard this bombshell toward the beginning

2️⃣ Half of the participants heard it toward the end.

Did the timing of the weakness change perception?

Yes. Dramatically.

According to Richard Wiseman²:

"When the cheating was mentioned toward the start of the tape, the man appeared far more likeable than when it was mentioned toward the end."

There's evidence that this occurs with court cases too.

Lawyers are judged as having a stronger case³ when they acknowledge a weakness in their argument at the start of a trial.

And many smart brands leverage the same bias. They share their weakness upfront.

  • Avis – “We’re No. 2. We try harder.”
  • Marmite – “Love it or hate it.”
  • Buckley’s – “It tastes awful. And it works.”
  • Guinness – “Good things come to those who wait.”
  • Listerine — “The taste you hate. Twice a day.”
  • Stella Artois — “Reassuringly expensive.”
  • KFC — “FCK. We’re sorry.”

So, if you have a weakeness and it's bound to come out.

Don't hide it.

Present it first.


Interested in more marketing ideas?

The fantastic team at Alt Marketing School runs a brilliant newsletter sharing quick marketing wins, campaign deep dives, and tactics you can actually use. It's one of the few marketing emails that consistently teaches something useful.

Subscribe today →


Cheers for reading!

Phill

P.S. I'm publishing my favourite podcast episode of the year on Monday—don't miss it.

¹Jones, E. E., & Gordon, E. M. (1972). Timing of self-disclosure and its effects on personal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 358–365.

²Wiseman, R. (2009). 59 seconds: Think a little, change a lot. Pan Macmillan.

³Williams, K. D., Bourgeois, M. J., & Croyle, R. T. (1993). The effects of stealing thunder in criminal and civil trials. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 597-609.

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule.

Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

Mystery Effect Read online I submit a gas and electricity reading every month. Not because I'm diligent or disciplined. But because my supplier (Octopus Energy) nudges me to do so. Every time I leave a gas reading, they let me spin a wheel to win a potential reward. Most suppliers just ask for a reading (left). Octopus offer a chance to win (right). I've shared this before, but I haven't shared much evidence as to why it works. So, take a look at these images from a 2022 study¹.Which would...

Long-Term Goals = Success? Read online You've probably heard of the “Yale Goal Study". Here's the study. In 1953, researchers interviewed Yale’s graduating class. They asked a simple question: “Have you written down your goals for life?” Twenty years later, they tracked the same students down. And discovered something dramatic. Just 3% had written specific goals. And that 3% had built more personal wealth than the other 97% combined. It’s a perfect self-help story, with a simple lesson. Make...

Commitment Devices Read online Often we plan to do something and don't. Donating blood, going on a run, watching that webinar. We want to, but forget. This drives marketers insane. People sign up for their events—but no one comes. Katy Milkman, a brilliant professor at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, found a solution¹. She used a commitment device. Milkman and her colleagues teamed up with a large American utility firm to see if they could prompt more of the company's...