Should you share a weakness upfront (or hide it)? | Nudge Newsletter


Sharing Weaknesses

Read online


In the 1970s, researchers Jones and Gordon¹ from Duke University played people a recording of a man (really a stooge) talking about his life.

During the tape the man explained he had not completed a school semester because he had been caught cheating and had been expelled.

The researchers edited the tape so that:

1️⃣ Half of the participants heard this bombshell toward the beginning

2️⃣ Half of the participants heard it toward the end.

Did the timing of the weakness change perception?

Yes. Dramatically.

According to Richard Wiseman²:

"When the cheating was mentioned toward the start of the tape, the man appeared far more likeable than when it was mentioned toward the end."

There's evidence that this occurs with court cases too.

Lawyers are judged as having a stronger case³ when they acknowledge a weakness in their argument at the start of a trial.

And many smart brands leverage the same bias. They share their weakness upfront.

  • Avis – “We’re No. 2. We try harder.”
  • Marmite – “Love it or hate it.”
  • Buckley’s – “It tastes awful. And it works.”
  • Guinness – “Good things come to those who wait.”
  • Listerine — “The taste you hate. Twice a day.”
  • Stella Artois — “Reassuringly expensive.”
  • KFC — “FCK. We’re sorry.”

So, if you have a weakeness and it's bound to come out.

Don't hide it.

Present it first.


Interested in more marketing ideas?

The fantastic team at Alt Marketing School runs a brilliant newsletter sharing quick marketing wins, campaign deep dives, and tactics you can actually use. It's one of the few marketing emails that consistently teaches something useful.

Subscribe today →


Cheers for reading!

Phill

P.S. I'm publishing my favourite podcast episode of the year on Monday—don't miss it.

¹Jones, E. E., & Gordon, E. M. (1972). Timing of self-disclosure and its effects on personal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 358–365.

²Wiseman, R. (2009). 59 seconds: Think a little, change a lot. Pan Macmillan.

³Williams, K. D., Bourgeois, M. J., & Croyle, R. T. (1993). The effects of stealing thunder in criminal and civil trials. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 597-609.

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule.

Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

Transparency Read online For his book Influence, Robert Cialdini went undercover as a waiter at a high-end restaurant. He spent his time shadowing Vincent, who consistently received the largest tips. Turns out, Vincent had a counterintuitive tactic. When it was time for the first person, normally a woman, to order, he went into his act. No matter what she picked, Vincent reacted identically: his brow furrowed, his hand hovered above his order pad, and after looking quickly over his shoulder...

Pratfall Effect Read online A few years back I received this review. It hurt me a bit and knocked my confidence. I was desperate for listeners to leave some positive reviews so others wouldn't see it. I tried to cover it up, but other brands do the opposite. Spa Diner promotes "the worst breakfast one man on Yelp ever had". Snowbird put their 1-star review in a double-page magazine ad. The Antelope pub share their negative reviews on Facebook. This sandwich shop printed out their 1-star...

The Issue With AI Read online There's a community on Reddit where users debate if an image is AI-generated. This image was subject to fierce debate. Turns out it is AI-generated. This is an AI pizza. In the comments, most users say they'd stop visiting a restaurant that used AI in its photos. Another user shared an example of their local pizza joints doing the same. Sarno forgot to erase the Papa John's logo from their AI pizza. Reddit users hate these AI images. One commenter said: "this...