Should you share a weakness upfront (or hide it)? | Nudge Newsletter


Sharing Weaknesses

Read online


In the 1970s, researchers Jones and Gordon¹ from Duke University played people a recording of a man (really a stooge) talking about his life.

During the tape the man explained he had not completed a school semester because he had been caught cheating and had been expelled.

The researchers edited the tape so that:

1️⃣ Half of the participants heard this bombshell toward the beginning

2️⃣ Half of the participants heard it toward the end.

Did the timing of the weakness change perception?

Yes. Dramatically.

According to Richard Wiseman²:

"When the cheating was mentioned toward the start of the tape, the man appeared far more likeable than when it was mentioned toward the end."

There's evidence that this occurs with court cases too.

Lawyers are judged as having a stronger case³ when they acknowledge a weakness in their argument at the start of a trial.

And many smart brands leverage the same bias. They share their weakness upfront.

  • Avis – “We’re No. 2. We try harder.”
  • Marmite – “Love it or hate it.”
  • Buckley’s – “It tastes awful. And it works.”
  • Guinness – “Good things come to those who wait.”
  • Listerine — “The taste you hate. Twice a day.”
  • Stella Artois — “Reassuringly expensive.”
  • KFC — “FCK. We’re sorry.”

So, if you have a weakeness and it's bound to come out.

Don't hide it.

Present it first.


Interested in more marketing ideas?

The fantastic team at Alt Marketing School runs a brilliant newsletter sharing quick marketing wins, campaign deep dives, and tactics you can actually use. It's one of the few marketing emails that consistently teaches something useful.

Subscribe today →


Cheers for reading!

Phill

P.S. I'm publishing my favourite podcast episode of the year on Monday—don't miss it.

¹Jones, E. E., & Gordon, E. M. (1972). Timing of self-disclosure and its effects on personal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 358–365.

²Wiseman, R. (2009). 59 seconds: Think a little, change a lot. Pan Macmillan.

³Williams, K. D., Bourgeois, M. J., & Croyle, R. T. (1993). The effects of stealing thunder in criminal and civil trials. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 597-609.

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule.

Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

The Mere Exposure Effect Read online Take a look at this image. What do you see? Taken from Robson's brilliant book The Expectation Effect¹ This is a real image, but it's bleached and poor quality. Chances are, you can't spot what this is. Have another look. Spotted anything? I imagine it's still a no. However, if I tell you to look for a cow, you might see the image differently. As Robson¹ writes: Something somehow “clicks,” and the image suddenly makes a lot more sense. Let's try another...

The Faith Effect Read online Watch an England football match and you'll see a lot of praying. Madueke, Toney, Guehi, Rashford and Saka from left to right. How many players are religious? Well, the evidence is thin. The Telegraph¹ confirms that at least four players are openly Christian. And Woman Alive² (a slightly less reputable source) claims as many as 50% of the team follow a god—higher than the UK average. Regardless of the true number, if you watch England, you'll see a lot of praying....

The Authority Bias Read online Here are some not-so-surprising stats. 20% of trades on the stock market are from brokers copying other profitable brokers¹. 60% of traders say they started trading by copying expert online². But do these financial experts really know more than the rest of us? That's what Richard Wiseman looked at in his great book, Quirkology. Investors vs Chimp Back in 1994, a Swedish newspaper ran a light-hearted experiment. The newspaper gave $1,250 each to five experienced...