Mount Everest's first measurement was 29,000 but surveyors reported it as 29,002. Here's why. | Nudge Newsletter


Specific Number Bias

Read online


I stumbled across this Reddit post a few weeks back.

Rather than listing the exact measurement of 29,000, the British Royal Geographical Society declared Mount Everest's elevation at 29,002.

Clearly, the surveyors thought that rounded numbers seem less believable.

Something that numerous studies have since proven.

Can You Spare 17 Cents?

In 1994, Santos, Leve and Pratkanis asked three female actors to approach 289 adults¹.

Each actor was instructed to ask the passersby for change. But there was a twist.

Half asked:

"Can you spare 17¢?"

The other half asked:

"Can you spare a quarter?"

The researchers wanted to know if asking for a specific number boosts donations.

It worked; the specific number made people 39% more likely to donate than the general request. It also led to a higher donation total (despite the actors asking for less).

19 years later, 5 different researchers tested the effect again.

Can You Spare 37 Seconds?

The 1994 study proved specific numbers worked with money, but would it work with time?

In 2015, Guéguen and his colleagues headed to the streets of Brittany in France².

For this experiment, they recruited four female actors dressed identically all in black to ask passersby to complete a survey.

300 passersby were asked (150 men and 150 women).

However, 150 were asked:

"I wonder if you have a little time to spare to answer a survey."

The other 150 were asked

"I wonder if you have 37 seconds to spare to answer a survey."

Of the 150 asked to spare a little time, only 63 agreed

Of the 150 asked to spare 37 seconds, 90 agreed.

A specific request boosted compliance by 42.9%.

Rounded numbers seem less believable. Specific numbers appear trustworthy.

So, when someone asks for 17 cents, we think, they must have a good reason.

When someone asks for 37 seconds, we think, this really won't take long.

And when Everest is measured at 29,002, we think that must be right!


The specific number bias is one of 85 principles you'll find in the Nudge Vaults.

In fact, inside the Nudge Vaults you'll find 12 more insights specifically about this bias.

Get access to all 529 insights* right now →

Or you can preview your first 50 insights for free

Cheers,

Phill

¹Santos, M. D., Leve, C., & Pratkanis, A. R. (1994). Hey buddy, can you spare seventeen cents? Mindful persuasion and the pique technique. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(9), 755–764.

²Guéguen, N., Meineri, S., Pascual, A., Girandola, F., & Silone, F. (2015). Hey buddy, can you give me 37 s of your time? Extension of the pique technique to a non-monetary solicitation and test of justification for compliance. Current Psychology, 35, 1–6.

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule.

*Yes, that's a blatant use of the specific number bias (I hope it works!).

Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

The AI Contradiction Read online I just generated an image in the style of Monet using AI. Have a look, and think about what makes this inferior to a real Monet painting. Made with AI* A few weeks back, X user "SHLOMS" did the same. SHLOM's post on X. 1,300 people responded. Most said this AI art was pure crap.They said it lacked "coherent composition". The colours were an "incoherent muddle". Some said it was "trying too hard". Others called it "obvious AI slop". Replies to "SHLOMS" included...

New and Safe Effect Read online In the early 1970s an ambitious young director released his film THX 1138. The concept went against many of the typical Hollywood storylines at the time. Set in a dystopian future where sex is outlawed and drug-taking is mandatory, the film was wildly different from what audiences were used to. The film was also a massive flop. Despite the a-list cast and big marketing budget, few watched it. The young director was discouraged and almost gave up until he read...

Generation Effect Read online This ad outside my local opticians sticks in my mind. "Blink if you need an eye exam." At first glance, it's bizzare. It doesn't promote the business, showcase a promotion, or entice people in. And yet, I think it's weirdly effective due to the generation effect. In 1978, researchers¹ asked participants to either read work pairs or generate missing words from cues. For example: Read condition: hot → cold Generate condition: hot → c___ Those generating answers...