How “Made In X” changes what we pay | Nudge Newsletter


The Country-of-Origin Effect

Read online


You’re thinking of buying a new pair of running shoes.

Usually, you go with Nike. But this time, you’re considering Umbro (a lesser-known brand).

Then you find out: Umbro makes their shoes in the UK.

Nice. It's always good to find locally made brands.

You’re willing to pay a decent price.

But the next day, you hear Umbro are moving production to South Korea.

Now, would you still pay the same?

Probably not.

That’s exactly what these researchers¹ found.

When Umbro was said to be made in the UK, people were happy to pay £81.

But when they heard the shoes were made in South Korea, it dropped to £61.

Same shoes. Different country. 18% drop.

That’s called the Country Image Effect.

Researchers ran a similar test with bottled water.

They told people the same brand came from either France or Austria.

People were willing to pay 33% more if it came from France.

Not because they liked the brand. They didn’t even know the brand.

It was purely about how they felt about the country.

France sounded premium. Austria, less so.


This is a form of framing.

Inside the Nudge Vaults you'll find 68 more insights specifically about this bias.

The Vaults was built right here in the UK. It contains insights from Oxford University and Imperial London*.

In fact, you can preview your first 50 insights for free

I hope you enjoyed today's newsletter — "British Phill"

*Yep, that's me trying to nudge you—sorry.

¹Koschate-Fischer, N., Diamantopoulos, A., & Oldenkotte, K. (2012). Are consumers really willing to pay more for a favorable country image? A study of country-of-origin effects on willingness to pay. Journal of International Marketing, 20(1), 19–41

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule.

Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

The Anchoring Effect Read online In the 1970s, Tversky and Kahneman¹ ran a simple experiment. They asked people: "What percentage of African countries are in the UN?" But before answering, participants had to spin a wheel with numbers from 0 to 100. The wheel was rigged to land on either 10 or 65. Then came the important question: "Is the actual percentage higher or lower than that number?" After that, participants gave their best estimate. Here’s what happened: People who saw 10 guessed 25%...

The Illusion of Choice Read online Give people $1 and two identical packs of gum. Same flavour. Same price. What happens? Most people aren't interested. That’s what Kim, Novemsky, and Dhar¹ found in a South Korean experiment. They gave participants ₩1,000 and two gum options, both priced at ₩630. Only 46% bought anything. But then they did something clever. They made the prices slightly different: ₩620 vs. ₩640. Now 77% decided to buy. Same gum. Slight price difference. Big impact. Why? When...

Input Bias Read online Does the 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭 put into a shop display 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 influence sales? That's what Morales¹ set out to answer in 2005. Participants were shown round the same store, except half saw the shelves 𝐧𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡-𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐲𝐬. The other participants saw the same products, but with a 𝐥𝐨𝐰-𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐲. The results are striking. Those who saw the high-effort display were willing to pay 24.4% 𝒎𝒐𝒓𝒆. After seeing a store display like Boots, customers were willing to pay...