How Google promoted Chrome in 2009 | Nudge Newsletter


Goal Dilution Effect

Read online


Keen listeners of Nudge will have heard Richard Shotton explain how Five Guys succeeded because they limited the number of items on their menu.

They focused on just burgers and chips.

That helped them improve and benefit from economies of scale.

But it also helped them psychologically, due to the goal dilution effect.

Here's why:

In a 2007 study by Zhang and Fishbach¹, participants were given information about how eating tomatoes could achieve certain goals.

Some are told eating tomatoes achieved just one goal: "𝘏𝘦𝘭𝘱 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘳"

Others are told eating tomatoes achieves two goals: "𝘏𝘦𝘭𝘱 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘥𝘦𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘺𝘦."

Zhang and Fishbach found that participants rated tomatoes as 12% more effective at preventing cancer when this was the only listed benefit, compared to when an additional health benefit was also included.

And I think Google knew this when they launched Chrome in 2009.

They called it, "The Fast Browser"

They didn't mention how passwords are synced, how security is best-in-class, or integrations with Gmail.

They didn't mention the extensions, stability, or automatic updates.

They could have done, but instead they focused on one benefit.

𝑺𝒑𝒆𝒆𝒅.

Google and Five Guys benefit from the same bias.

They didn't attempt to be a jack-of-all-trades.

They focused on one benefit, and that focus boosted how believable their claims seemed.


Big thanks to today's sponsors, GWI.

Are you stuck in a creative rut ahead of your next campaign? Or working late again to prepare for a pitch?

Don’t stress — just ask Agent Spark, your on-hand insights analyst.

Agent Spark gives you insights on your audience in seconds — so you can get inspired, validate hunches, and build smarter campaigns backed by consumer data.

The insights are backed by 2M+ annual surveys and billions of consumers — the same GWI data trusted by teams at Google, Microsoft, and Spotify.

And the best part? You can use it in the GWI platform, ChatGPT, Claude, or your favourite AI tool. You choose.

Ready to spark your next big idea?


Have you seen another firm use goal dilution? Reply and let me know. — Phill

¹Zhang, Y., & Fishbach, A. (2007). The role of goal systems in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 1–11.

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule.

Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

Framing Your Food Read online Which of these would you rather eat: One Shepherd's Pie is described as: Beef shepherd's pie, tomato and pesto sauce The other is described as: Beef subtly seasoned with Espelette pepper under a rich velvety potato puree, topped with crisp parmesan cheese crumbs Two researchers ran a small study at a French cafeteria to test if these descriptions changed the perception of the food.¹ Diners were invited to eat a prix fixe lunch. A real photo of the cafeteria from...

Concrete Phrases Read online Could writing "𝐀𝐂𝐓𝐔𝐀𝐋 𝐒𝐈𝐙𝐄" on a Whopper ad make it sell for 𝒎𝒐𝒓𝒆? In 2022, 465 participants saw ads for a fictional Lay's multipack.¹ Both groups knew the multipack was 392g in size, but each saw a different headline. One saw: 𝘓𝘢𝘺'𝘴 𝘊𝘩𝘪𝘱𝘴, 14 𝘴𝘯𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘣𝘢𝘨𝘴The other saw:𝘓𝘢𝘺'𝘴 𝘊𝘩𝘪𝘱𝘴, 392𝘨. Those who saw "14 snack bags" were willing to pay 10% 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 than the other group.This is due to the concrete phrases effect. We can picture 14 snack bags in our mind. 392g doesn't...

Variable Rewards Read online This video of a smart gas station owner went viral a couple of months back. Here's the original. The video shows dozens of customers failing to balance 25 cents on a lemon. A chance to win $100 is a carrot large enough to make customers bet. It shows something that many marketers have known for decades. We love a gamble. People prefer a gamble In 2025, researchers Gaertig and Simmons offered either a gamble or a certain reward to hundreds of participants¹. Some...