What's in your £5 pint? | Nudge Newsletter


Price Transparency

Read online


I spent far too much time moaning about the price of pints.

I'd harp on about the £3 ales I used to buy and how they're £5.50 today.

And then I saw this image.

13p profit!?

Suddenly £5 for a pint seems quite reasonable.

And there's evidence to prove this price transparency tactic works.

In 2020, Harvard researchers¹ tested the effects of showing a product's costs.

Rather than just listing the price, they showed ingredient cost (and profit margin).

For the test, this ad was shown in the Harvard canteen.

Real-world sales were measured directly after the student saw the ad.

Turns out, students were 21% more likely to buy the soup 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐬 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐰𝐧.

Showcasing your costs boosts trust and makes customers more likely to buy.


Big thanks to today's sponsors, GWI.

Are you stuck in a creative rut ahead of your next campaign? Or working late again to prepare for a pitch?

Don’t stress — just ask Agent Spark, your on-hand insights analyst.

Agent Spark gives you insights on your audience in seconds — so you can get inspired, validate hunches, and build smarter campaigns backed by consumer data.

The insights are backed by 2M+ annual surveys and billions of consumers — the same GWI data trusted by teams at Google, Microsoft, and Spotify.

And the best part? You can use it in the GWI platform, ChatGPT, Claude, or your favourite AI tool. You choose.

Ready to spark your next big idea?


Hope you enjoyed today's newsletter — Phill

¹Mohan, B., Buell, R. W., & John, L. K. (2020). Lifting the veil: The benefits of cost transparency. Marketing Science, 39(6), 1105–1121.

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule.

Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

The Halo Effect Read online The World Cup is here, and England's kit looks a bit naff. Cole Palmer wearing a shirt that looks 2x too big. The kit seems ill-fitting; it looks far too baggy around the shoulders, and the neck is too wide. If Nike surveyed my opinion for their market research, I'd give it a 1/5. But my opinion could change very soon. Success shifts perception. In 2019, researcher Gerd Nufer¹ asked 3,178 football fans to rank the quality of their club's kits. For the study, six...

Specific Number Bias Read online I stumbled across this Reddit post a few weeks back. Everest surveyors added two feet to their measurement to appear accurate. Rather than listing the exact measurement of 29,000, the British Royal Geographical Society declared Mount Everest's elevation at 29,002. Clearly, the surveyors thought that rounded numbers seem less believable. Something that numerous studies have since proven. Can You Spare 17 Cents? In 1994, Santos, Leve and Pratkanis asked three...

The AI Contradiction Read online I just generated an image in the style of Monet using AI. Have a look, and think about what makes this inferior to a real Monet painting. Made with AI* A few weeks back, X user "SHLOMS" did the same. SHLOM's post on X. 1,300 people responded. Most said this AI art was pure crap.They said it lacked "coherent composition". The colours were an "incoherent muddle". Some said it was "trying too hard". Others called it "obvious AI slop". Replies to "SHLOMS" included...