How three words made this beer feel twice as valuable | Nudge Newsletter


Hyperbolic Discounting

Read online


One of these ads looks 108% better value.

Can you guess which?

In 2025, Shotton and Flicker¹ tested ads like this in their book.

282 consumers were shown Sierra Nevada Pale Ale priced at $18.99 for 12 bottles.

Half were told this equated to $1.58 per bottle.

Among those shown the per-bottle price, 28.6% said it was good or very good value (more than double the 13.7% who only saw the total price).

Framing the cost at the per-unit level made the purchase feel more reasonable and affordable.

This is why the Huel ad on the right looks like much better value than the one on the left.

And why Nespresso became insanely popular by creating ads that talked about price per pod, not price per gram.

I'm using this very Nudge on the landing page for my latest product (let me know if you spot it).

The takeaway is simple.

Want your price to appear better value? Break it down. — Phill

P.S. Hacking The Human Mind is easily one of the best behavioural science books I've read this year. I can't recommend it enough.

¹Hacking the Human Mind, Shotton and Flicker (2025)

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule.

Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

The Anchoring Effect Read online In the 1970s, Tversky and Kahneman¹ ran a simple experiment. They asked people: "What percentage of African countries are in the UN?" But before answering, participants had to spin a wheel with numbers from 0 to 100. The wheel was rigged to land on either 10 or 65. Then came the important question: "Is the actual percentage higher or lower than that number?" After that, participants gave their best estimate. Here’s what happened: People who saw 10 guessed 25%...

The Illusion of Choice Read online Give people $1 and two identical packs of gum. Same flavour. Same price. What happens? Most people aren't interested. That’s what Kim, Novemsky, and Dhar¹ found in a South Korean experiment. They gave participants ₩1,000 and two gum options, both priced at ₩630. Only 46% bought anything. But then they did something clever. They made the prices slightly different: ₩620 vs. ₩640. Now 77% decided to buy. Same gum. Slight price difference. Big impact. Why? When...

Input Bias Read online Does the 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭 put into a shop display 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 influence sales? That's what Morales¹ set out to answer in 2005. Participants were shown round the same store, except half saw the shelves 𝐧𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡-𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐲𝐬. The other participants saw the same products, but with a 𝐥𝐨𝐰-𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐲. The results are striking. Those who saw the high-effort display were willing to pay 24.4% 𝒎𝒐𝒓𝒆. After seeing a store display like Boots, customers were willing to pay...