Does behavioural science work in B2B? | Nudge Newsletter


The Effort Illusion

Read online


In 2003, two researchers¹ proved the illusion of effort.

It means we value things more if we believe it took a lot of time to create.

Chinander and Schweitzer had groups watch identical presentations.

Groups were told one of two things:

  • "This presentation took 8 hours and 34 minutes to prepare."
  • "This presentation took 37 minutes to prepare."

Those told the presentation took longer to prep rated it significantly higher.

Can I prove this works?

On Nudge, I like to run my own tests.

I gathered participants (pictured below) and showed them the same video.

However, my groups were told one of two things:

  • "My video took 10 minutes to create."
  • "My video took 3 weeks to create."

Turns out, participants thought the video was significantly better if told it took 3 weeks to create.

But does it work in B2B?

Richard Shotton² showed 500 B2B buyers the same ad for a fictitious cybersecurity company.

This group was told. either:

  1. The ad was made in 10 minutes by AI.
  2. The ad was made in a week by a specialist agency.
  3. The ad was made in three months by a specialist agency and a Japanese origami artist.

Does it work in B2B?

Absolutely.

B2B buyers were much more likely to trust the brand after seeing the supposedly high-effort ad.

They also thought the brand was more creative, more innovative and found the ad more appealing.

Of course behavioural science works in B2B. We're all human after all. — Phill

P.S. I'm interviewing Richard and Michael Aaron on his latest book soon. That episode will be out at the end of September.

¹Chinander, K. R., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2003). The input bias: The misuse of input information in judgments of outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(2), 243–253.

²Shotton, R., & Flicker, M. A. (2025). Hacking the Human Mind: The behavioral science secrets behind 17 of the world’s best brands. Harriman House.

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule.

Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

The Nature Effect Read online Are you happier outside? In one 2013 study¹ one million iPhone notifications were sent to 20,000 Brits at various times of day, over a six-month period. The app prompted participants to report their happiness. The app used in the study The phone's GPS determined if the participant was outside or inside. Turns out, those outdoors were much happier. Compared to those inside, participants outside were "significantly and substantially happier", according to the...

Newsletter images (no colour)

The Framing Effect Read online Many plant-based products are failing due to bad naming. In 2018¹, a study was conducted with 727 Brits who already ate meat. Renaming the “𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐭-𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐛𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐟𝐚𝐬𝐭” to “𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐥𝐝-𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐛𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐟𝐚𝐬𝐭” made diners 200% more likely to pick the plant-based option. Similarly, renaming “𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐭-𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐚𝐬𝐡” as “𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐥𝐝-𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐬𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐚𝐬𝐡” made it twice as popular. The paper went on to find that a Veggie Burger will be more popular if it’s called a “𝐋𝐨𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐁𝐮𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐫”. And...

The Framing Effect Read online Here's a thought experiment. You've been told you have lung cancer. The doctor asks if you want treatment. She tells you: "68% survive one year after surgery" Hearing this, you'd probably opt for surgery, that's what the majority pick¹. But what if the doctor said: "32% die within one year after surgery" Now, if you're like those in this¹ study, you'd be less likely to choose surgery. It's the same odds of survival. But the wording changed behaviour. This is the...