Do you work as hard in a group? | Nudge Newsletter


The Ringelmann Effect

Read online


In 1882, French engineer Maximilien Ringelmann studied effort.¹

He measured how much weight each man could pull.

Individually, the men could pull 85 kg.

But in groups of seven, they averaged just 65 kg, a 24% drop.

This became known as the Ringelmann Effect.

Put simply, it proved that as group size increases, individual effort decreases.

Most of us will have seen this in the workplace, typically in bloated meetings where nothing gets done.

But it's not conclusive.

See Colin Fisher, in his book², shared how eventually social scientists discovered that groups in which additional individuals improved performance.

What was different about these groups?

Well, they tackled complex tasks.

The takeaway is clear;

  • Leave simple tasks to individuals.
  • Delegate complex tasks to a group.

Let me know what you thought of today's newsletter. — Phill

P.S. I interviewed Dr Fisher on the podcast last week; his episode will be out soon.

¹Ringelmann, M. (1913). Recherches sur les moteurs animés: Travail de l'homme. Annales de l’Institut National Agronomique, 12, 1–40.

²Fisher, C. M. (2025). The Collective Edge: Unlocking the secret power of groups. Avery.

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule.

Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

The Halo Effect Read online The World Cup is here, and England's kit looks a bit naff. Cole Palmer wearing a shirt that looks 2x too big. The kit seems ill-fitting; it looks far too baggy around the shoulders, and the neck is too wide. If Nike surveyed my opinion for their market research, I'd give it a 1/5. But my opinion could change very soon. Success shifts perception. In 2019, researcher Gerd Nufer¹ asked 3,178 football fans to rank the quality of their club's kits. For the study, six...

Specific Number Bias Read online I stumbled across this Reddit post a few weeks back. Everest surveyors added two feet to their measurement to appear accurate. Rather than listing the exact measurement of 29,000, the British Royal Geographical Society declared Mount Everest's elevation at 29,002. Clearly, the surveyors thought that rounded numbers seem less believable. Something that numerous studies have since proven. Can You Spare 17 Cents? In 1994, Santos, Leve and Pratkanis asked three...

The AI Contradiction Read online I just generated an image in the style of Monet using AI. Have a look, and think about what makes this inferior to a real Monet painting. Made with AI* A few weeks back, X user "SHLOMS" did the same. SHLOM's post on X. 1,300 people responded. Most said this AI art was pure crap.They said it lacked "coherent composition". The colours were an "incoherent muddle". Some said it was "trying too hard". Others called it "obvious AI slop". Replies to "SHLOMS" included...