Did a chimpanzee really beat five investors on the stock market? | Nudge Newsletter


The Authority Bias

Read online


Here are some not-so-surprising stats.

20% of trades on the stock market are from brokers copying other profitable brokers¹.

60% of traders say they started trading by copying expert online².

But do these financial experts really know more than the rest of us?

That's what Richard Wiseman looked at in his great book, Quirkology.

Investors vs Chimp

Back in 1994, a Swedish newspaper ran a light-hearted experiment.

The newspaper gave $1,250 each to five experienced investors and a chimpanzee named Ola.

The experienced investors used their wisdom and experience to pick the best stocks.

Ola selected stocks by throwing darts at companies listed on the Stockholm Exchange.

Wiseman writes that:

After a month, the newspaper compared the profits and losses made by each competitor: Ola had outperformed the financial wizards.

The Wall Street Journal ran a similar test: four investors each pick a stock, while four others are chosen using a dartboard.

After six months, the returns are compared. The dartboard often performs better and almost always beats at least one or two of the experts.

Which begs the question. Why do so many traders still copy others?

Well, it's due to the authority bias.

We feel an urge to follow the actions of high-authority others.

In the book Free Your Mind, Patrick Fagan shares a study on the bias.

It found that letters from a dentist's office saw a 54% return rate when signed by the dentist, but only 18% when signed by the dentist's secretary.

In other words, we heed advice from those in power, which is unfortunate, because often their advice is as good as an ape's.


The authority bias is one of 85 nudges you'll find in the Nudge Vaults.

In fact, inside the Nudge Vaults you'll find 11 more insights specifically about that bias.

I should add that the Vaults contain research from Stanford, Harvard, Oxford University and LSE*. Why not sign up today?

Or you can preview your first 50 insights for free

Phill

¹The Trading View. (2025, January 14). Exclusive: Copy trading brings up to 20% trading volume for CFDs brokers. Finance Magnates. https://www.tradingview.com/news/financemagnates%3A23817be87094b%3A0-exclusive-copy-trading-brings-up-to-20-trading-volume-for-cfds-brokers/

²Mitra, P. (2024, May 3). One in six regular retail investors and traders are copy traders, study finds. Funds Europe. https://funds-europe.com/one-in-six-regular-retail-investors-and-traders-are-copy-traders-study-finds/

³Associated Press. (1993, September 9). Chimp makes chumps of analysts. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1993-09-09-fi-33156-story.html

*Yes, that's a very blatant use of the authority bias. I hope it worked.

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule.

Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

The Halo Effect Read online The World Cup is here, and England's kit looks a bit naff. Cole Palmer wearing a shirt that looks 2x too big. The kit seems ill-fitting; it looks far too baggy around the shoulders, and the neck is too wide. If Nike surveyed my opinion for their market research, I'd give it a 1/5. But my opinion could change very soon. Success shifts perception. In 2019, researcher Gerd Nufer¹ asked 3,178 football fans to rank the quality of their club's kits. For the study, six...

Specific Number Bias Read online I stumbled across this Reddit post a few weeks back. Everest surveyors added two feet to their measurement to appear accurate. Rather than listing the exact measurement of 29,000, the British Royal Geographical Society declared Mount Everest's elevation at 29,002. Clearly, the surveyors thought that rounded numbers seem less believable. Something that numerous studies have since proven. Can You Spare 17 Cents? In 1994, Santos, Leve and Pratkanis asked three...

The AI Contradiction Read online I just generated an image in the style of Monet using AI. Have a look, and think about what makes this inferior to a real Monet painting. Made with AI* A few weeks back, X user "SHLOMS" did the same. SHLOM's post on X. 1,300 people responded. Most said this AI art was pure crap.They said it lacked "coherent composition". The colours were an "incoherent muddle". Some said it was "trying too hard". Others called it "obvious AI slop". Replies to "SHLOMS" included...