Why the WHSmith rebrand will fail | Nudge Newsletter


Don't Change The Name

Read online


I shared a (semi) viral post about the WHSmith rebrand a few weeks back.

WHSmith, a two-century-old British retailer, was sold.

As part of the sale, the name had to change.

WHSmith would become TGJones.

For non-Brits, this name change is a big deal.

WHSmith has been on British high streets for over two centuries.

And there are 3 behavioural science reasons why I think this rebrand will fail.

1. Habits

In Jan 2009, Tropicana rebranded.

Their new sleek design was supposed to attract new customers.

It did the opposite. Sales dropped by 20%.

In his book Decoded, Phil Barden¹ explains why.

We're creatures of habit; most purchases are based on system one unconscious thought.

Disrupting that habit with a significant rebrand will therefore reduce sales.

2. Mere exposure

Psychologist Robert Zajonc² (1968) found that students rated unfamiliar Turkish words more favorably when they had seen them more often.

Termed the "mere exposure effect", the study proved that repeated exposure to a name, idea, or brand increases likability and perceived truthfulness.

He found the same effect with strange hooded men appearing in his lectures.

I've seen the name WHSmith probably 5,000 times.

That repeat exposure makes me trust the brand and like it (a bit).

It makes me more likely to buy.

Remove the name, and you remove all that value.

3. Input bias

The more effort that goes into something, the more we value it.

WHSmith has been around for 200 years. Even with its dwindling sales, that counts for something.

I studied the input bias on my listeners a few months back.

Simply telling them "I've spent three weeks on this video" boosted enjoyment by 35%³.

Removing the name WHSmith removes the input bias.

TGJones has been around for 0 years, and that lack of history could harm sales.


Sponsored by: The Rundown AI

Start learning AI in 2025

Everyone talks about AI, but no one has the time to learn it. So, we found the simplest way to learn AI in as little time as possible: The Rundown AI.

It's a free AI newsletter that keeps you up-to-date on the latest AI news, and teaches you how to apply it in just 5 minutes a day.

Plus, complete the quiz after signing up and they’ll recommend the best AI tools, guides, and courses – tailored to your needs.

I don't want to claim that TGJones won't be a success.

Or that WHSmith shouldn't have sold.

But behavioural science reveals the pitfalls of rebrands.

And most of the evidence suggests this will fail.

What do you think?Phill

¹Barden, P. (2013). Decoded: The science behind why we buy. John Wiley & Sons.

²Zajonc, R. B. (1968). The attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt.2), 1–27.

³Agnew, P. (Host). (2024, November 18). Can I create a viral YouTube video? In Nudge. Apple Podcasts.

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule*

Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

The Illusion of Choice Read online Give people $1 and two identical packs of gum. Same flavour. Same price. What happens? Most people aren't interested. That’s what Kim, Novemsky, and Dhar¹ found in a South Korean experiment. They gave participants ₩1,000 and two gum options, both priced at ₩630. Only 46% bought anything. But then they did something clever. They made the prices slightly different: ₩620 vs. ₩640. Now 77% decided to buy. Same gum. Slight price difference. Big impact. Why? When...

Input Bias Read online Does the 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭 put into a shop display 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 influence sales? That's what Morales¹ set out to answer in 2005. Participants were shown round the same store, except half saw the shelves 𝐧𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡-𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐲𝐬. The other participants saw the same products, but with a 𝐥𝐨𝐰-𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐲. The results are striking. Those who saw the high-effort display were willing to pay 24.4% 𝒎𝒐𝒓𝒆. After seeing a store display like Boots, customers were willing to pay...

Concrete Phrases Read online Which electric bus would stick in your mind? It's not even a competition. Copy that's easy to visualise is easy to memorise. In 2021, Richard Shotton¹ showed participants a number of vague phrases, like 'innovative quality', and then some concrete phrases, e.g., 'money in your pocket'. Shotton’s concrete phrases were 8.6x more likely to be remembered. Richard Shotton's Concrete Phrases Study He’d proved the concrete phrases' effect, a phenomenon first discovered...