Why I walked 60.7km to talk at a marketing conference | Nudge Newsletter


Effort Boosts Value

Read online


Last Wednesday, I walked 60.7km to talk at Creator Day 25.

It took me 12 hours. 3,818 calories. 2 Greggs sausage rolls. And 6 nasty blisters.

My day started at sunrise and didn't finish until 6:49 pm.

I got through four pairs of socks, got lost twice, and almost gave up.

So, why? Why did I do it

Effort boosts your enjoyment.

I knew the more effort I put in, the more I'd value the talk. That's the IKEA Effect¹.

So, I decided, rather than simply getting the train down, I'd walk.

That obscene amount of effort would make me enjoy the day. But that wasn't all.

Effort boosts others' enjoyment.

My walk wouldn't just make me enjoy the talk, it'd make others value² it too.

I tested this in a previous episode of Nudge.

I told some viewers that creating a video promoting the show took 10 minutes.

I told others it took 3 weeks to create.

Those who heard it took longer, enjoyed it 35% more.

Enjoyment boosts others' enjoyment.

But there's one more reason I hiked 60.7km.

I knew I'd enjoy it. It was a genuinely incredible day, just look at the weather.

And I knew if I shared that enjoyment, the audience would like my talk more.

Danny Zane³ and co proved that sharing a chef's enjoyment made diners enjoy their food more.

Did it work?

I asked the Creator Day organiser, Mark Masters, what people actually thought of my talk.

Here's what he shared.

I'll be back at Creator Day in 2026. It's genuinely the most fun I've ever had at a conference. It's on Thursday, May 14th, back down in Poole.

To join me (and secure your early bird price), head here. (Mark limits attendees to 300, so be quick.)

Alright, enough work, I'm putting my feet upPhill

P.S. If you want me to speak at your next event, email me at phill(at)nudgepodcast.com. I can't promise I'll walk there, though.

¹The “IKEA Effect”: When Labor Leads to Love (2011)

²The input bias: The misuse of input information in judgments of outcomes (2003)

³Paley, Anna, Robert W. Smith, Jacob D. Teeny, and Daniel M. Zane (2024), “Production Enjoyment Asymmetrically Impacts Buyers’ Willingness to Pay and Sellers’ Willingness to Charge,” Journal of Marketing.

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule*

Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

Input Bias Read online Does the 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭 put into a shop display 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 influence sales? That's what Morales¹ set out to answer in 2005. Participants were shown round the same store, except half saw the shelves 𝐧𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡-𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐲𝐬. The other participants saw the same products, but with a 𝐥𝐨𝐰-𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐲. The results are striking. Those who saw the high-effort display were willing to pay 24.4% 𝒎𝒐𝒓𝒆. After seeing a store display like Boots, customers were willing to pay...

Concrete Phrases Read online Which electric bus would stick in your mind? It's not even a competition. Copy that's easy to visualise is easy to memorise. In 2021, Richard Shotton¹ showed participants a number of vague phrases, like 'innovative quality', and then some concrete phrases, e.g., 'money in your pocket'. Shotton’s concrete phrases were 8.6x more likely to be remembered. Richard Shotton's Concrete Phrases Study He’d proved the concrete phrases' effect, a phenomenon first discovered...

Psychology of Pricing Read online 1) Charm Pricing for High-Quality Products Imagine you’re buying a shatterproof iPhone case Does it matter if it is priced at £49.99 or £49.95? Well, yes. Apple uses charm pricing but usually ends prices with a 5. Gendall, Fox, and Wilton (1998)¹ ran an experiment with fast-moving consumer goods (fly spray, cheese) and durables (electric kettles). They found that prices with endings in 99 cents are more attractive for low-priced, fast-moving consumer goods...