3 evidence-backed pricing tips worth stealing | Nudge Newsletter


Psychology of Pricing

Read online


1) Charm Pricing for High-Quality Products

Imagine you’re buying a shatterproof iPhone case

Does it matter if it is priced at £49.99 or £49.95?

Well, yes.

Gendall, Fox, and Wilton (1998)¹ ran an experiment with fast-moving consumer goods (fly spray, cheese) and durables (electric kettles).

They found that prices with endings in 99 cents are more attractive for low-priced, fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) than 95 endings.

However, for high-quality, high-priced products, ending in 95 made the demand higher than endings in 99 cents.

2) Right-Digit Discounts

One of these ads seems like better value.


But it's not the cheaper one.

In 2007, Coulter and Coulter² showed these discounts to different groups of consumers.

Turns out, consumers were more likely to buy when the prices ended in small right-hand digits (£244 to £233), compared to prices ending in higher right-hand digits (£199 to £188).

Why?

Researchers found that people more easily differentiate smaller numbers.

The difference between 4 → 3 seems more salient than 9 → 8.

Next time you run a discount, make the sale price and RRP less than five.

3) Avoid Charm Pricing For Hedonic Products

When buying Valentine's Day flowers, which price feels better: £45.78 or £45?

For the flowers, it’s probably £45.

Wadhwa and Zhang (2015)³ found that round prices feel more right for hedonic, emotion-based products, whereas odd prices are appropriate for utilitarian, cognition-based products.

In the experiment, participants had to indicate their purchase likelihood for two products:

A hedonic product: a bouquet of flowers,

And a utilitarian product: a calculator

Prices were set at three levels: rounded ($40), non-rounded/low ($39.72) and non-rounded/high ($40.28).

Turns out, customers indicated a higher likelihood to buy a hedonic product at a rounded price.

The opposite is true for utilitarian products.

Customers prefer non-rounded prices to rounded prices.


Did you find these three tips useful?

Well, there are 74 pricing tips just like this in the Vaults.

The Vaults details all the behavioural science insights I've found and explains how you can apply them.

Preview your first 50 insights for free

Hope you enjoyed today's newsletter — Phill

¹Gendall, P., Fox, M. F., & Wilton, P. (1998). Estimating the effect of odd pricing. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 7(5), 421-432.

²Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2007). Distortion of price discount perceptions: The right digit effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 162–173.

³Wadhwa, M., & Zhang, K. (2015). This number just feels right: The impact of roundedness of price numbers on product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(5), 1172–1185

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule.

Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

Long-Term Goals = Success? Read online You've probably heard of the “Yale Goal Study". Here's the study. In 1953, researchers interviewed Yale’s graduating class. They asked a simple question: “Have you written down your goals for life?” Twenty years later, they tracked the same students down. And discovered something dramatic. Just 3% had written specific goals. And that 3% had built more personal wealth than the other 97% combined. It’s a perfect self-help story, with a simple lesson. Make...

Commitment Devices Read online Often we plan to do something and don't. Donating blood, going on a run, watching that webinar. We want to, but forget. This drives marketers insane. People sign up for their events—but no one comes. Katy Milkman, a brilliant professor at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, found a solution¹. She used a commitment device. Milkman and her colleagues teamed up with a large American utility firm to see if they could prompt more of the company's...

Incentives: Do they work? Read online I've been critical of incentives in the past, citing examples where they backfire. But this¹ incredible 2016 study altered my opinion. Across 63 schools, 10,649 pupils in their final year of GCSEs took part in an experiment. The schools in the study. The students were split into three groups: Control group: these students received no financial incentives Financial rewards: would receive to £320 for attendance, behaviour, classwork and homework...