3 evidence-backed pricing tips worth stealing | Nudge Newsletter


Psychology of Pricing

Read online


1) Charm Pricing for High-Quality Products

Imagine you’re buying a shatterproof iPhone case

Does it matter if it is priced at £49.99 or £49.95?

Well, yes.

Gendall, Fox, and Wilton (1998)¹ ran an experiment with fast-moving consumer goods (fly spray, cheese) and durables (electric kettles).

They found that prices with endings in 99 cents are more attractive for low-priced, fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) than 95 endings.

However, for high-quality, high-priced products, ending in 95 made the demand higher than endings in 99 cents.

2) Right-Digit Discounts

One of these ads seems like better value.


But it's not the cheaper one.

In 2007, Coulter and Coulter² showed these discounts to different groups of consumers.

Turns out, consumers were more likely to buy when the prices ended in small right-hand digits (£244 to £233), compared to prices ending in higher right-hand digits (£199 to £188).

Why?

Researchers found that people more easily differentiate smaller numbers.

The difference between 4 → 3 seems more salient than 9 → 8.

Next time you run a discount, make the sale price and RRP less than five.

3) Avoid Charm Pricing For Hedonic Products

When buying Valentine's Day flowers, which price feels better: £45.78 or £45?

For the flowers, it’s probably £45.

Wadhwa and Zhang (2015)³ found that round prices feel more right for hedonic, emotion-based products, whereas odd prices are appropriate for utilitarian, cognition-based products.

In the experiment, participants had to indicate their purchase likelihood for two products:

A hedonic product: a bouquet of flowers,

And a utilitarian product: a calculator

Prices were set at three levels: rounded ($40), non-rounded/low ($39.72) and non-rounded/high ($40.28).

Turns out, customers indicated a higher likelihood to buy a hedonic product at a rounded price.

The opposite is true for utilitarian products.

Customers prefer non-rounded prices to rounded prices.


Did you find these three tips useful?

Well, there are 74 pricing tips just like this in the Vaults.

The Vaults details all the behavioural science insights I've found and explains how you can apply them.

Preview your first 50 insights for free

Hope you enjoyed today's newsletter — Phill

¹Gendall, P., Fox, M. F., & Wilton, P. (1998). Estimating the effect of odd pricing. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 7(5), 421-432.

²Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2007). Distortion of price discount perceptions: The right digit effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 162–173.

³Wadhwa, M., & Zhang, K. (2015). This number just feels right: The impact of roundedness of price numbers on product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(5), 1172–1185

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule.

Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

Barnum Effect Read online Why does the ad on the 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 capture attention? Well, it might be down to the question.Rohini Ahluwalia and Robert Burnkrant's study¹ in 2004 tested two types of ads. Statement-based ads: "You haven't had a pear in a while."And... Question ads: "When was the last time you had a pear?" The researchers found that ads using questions are rated 14% 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐟𝐚𝐯𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐲 than statement-based ads. So, why not turn your statement into a question? I tested this myself in two...

The Country-of-Origin Effect Read online You’re thinking of buying a new pair of running shoes. Usually, you go with Nike. But this time, you’re considering Umbro (a lesser-known brand). Then you find out: Umbro makes their shoes in the UK. Nice. It's always good to find locally made brands. You’re willing to pay a decent price. But the next day, you hear Umbro are moving production to South Korea. Now, would you still pay the same? Probably not. That’s exactly what these researchers¹ found....

The Anchoring Effect Read online In the 1970s, Tversky and Kahneman¹ ran a simple experiment. They asked people: "What percentage of African countries are in the UN?" But before answering, participants had to spin a wheel with numbers from 0 to 100. The wheel was rigged to land on either 10 or 65. Then came the important question: "Is the actual percentage higher or lower than that number?" After that, participants gave their best estimate. Here’s what happened: People who saw 10 guessed 25%...