I've just spent two days traveling from London to Valencia by train.
Over the 48 hours, I saw a lot of crap messaging.
The worst offender = Valencia tram ticket machine.
Look at the image and ask yourself, how do I activate my ticket?
A day later, I discovered it's the big red circle to the left.
I believe that almost every message could be improved by behavioural science.
I've collected six successful messages with BS principles behind them to prove my point.
Anchoring — De Beers
In the 1930s, only 10% of Americans bought diamond engagement rings.
Most spent a smaller proportion of their disposable income on cheaper gems.
So, to break the habit, De Beers came up with a new anchor.
They said, "How can you make two months' salary last forever?".
Hardly anyone spent two months' salary on an engagement ring before this.
But this new anchor shifted perception.
Today, 90% of engagement rings are diamond.
Pratfall Effect — Avis
Rental car company Avis always lagged 2nd for market share behind Hertz.
Most companies would hide this weakness, but Avis embraced it.
Aronson's 1966¹ study found that we like smart people more if they have flaws.
So, Avis took this to heart and flaunted their weakness.
Generation Effect — Gut Check
There's a straightforward way to get someone to notice your ad.
Remove a letter.
In 2020, researchers² showed participants brand names with missing letters.
H_BC, Goo_e, Li_erpool FC, N_dge.
It turns out that participants remember those brand names 14% more than entirely written brands (e.g., HSBC), with a recall rate of 92% versus 81%.
The Gut Foundation applied this to their ads.
They didn't tell drivers to get checked. They advertised 100% "anus beef".
The purposeful typo forced drivers to pay attention.
Keats Heuristic — Tesco
Rhymes are potent messaging tools.
Researchers McGlone and Tofighbakhsh³ showed participants two sets of proverbs.
Some rhymed; e.g. Woes unite foes.
Some didn't rhyme (but meant the same thing); e.g. Woes unite enemies.
The study revealed that rhyming proverbs were deemed 17% more trustworthy and memorable than their non-rhyming counterparts.
Tesco use the same principle to boost sales of its reduced veg.
A message that rhymes is more believable.
Endowment Effect — NHS
If you feel you own something, you'll value it more.
Katy Milkman⁴ applied this to persuasive messaging in her fantastic 2021 study.
Stating "your vaccine is reserved for you" made readers 4.6% more likely to get vaccinated as the reservation language boosts feelings of ownership. The NHS applied this principle to boost uptake of the Covid-19 vaccination.
Don't say it's available, say it's reserved.
Specific Numbers — Forest
In a 2006 study⁵, consumers saw ads for a fictitious deodorant.
Some were told it lasts "exactly 47% longer than rivals"
Others were told it lasts "more than 50% longer than rivals"
Which message do you think worked? It's probably not what you'd expect.
The precise 47% claim was deemed 10% more accurate by 199 participants.
Why? Well, it's the specific number. Specificity enhances the perceived accuracy and trustworthiness of claims.
And Forest applies this brilliantly in their 2024 billboard.
"51,899,782 free minutes" is more persuasive than "lots of free minutes".
Please reply. I read (and respond) to every email you send—that's 192 emails in 2025 if you're counting.
And if you have any Valencia tips, let me know — Phill
¹Aronson, E., Willerman, B., & Floyd, J. (1966). The effect of a pratfall on increasing interpersonal attractiveness. Psychonomic Science, 4(6), 227–228. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03342263
²Shotton, R. (2023). The illusion of choice: 16 ½ psychological biases that influence what we buy. Harriman House.
³McGlone, M. S., & Tofighbakhsh, J. (2000). Birds of a feather flock conjointly (?): Rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychological Science, 11(5), 424–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00282 ⁴Milkman, K. L., Patel, M. S., Gandhi, L., Graci, H. N., Gromet, D. M., Ho, H., Kay, J. S., Lee, T. W., Rothschild, J., Bogard, J. E., Brody, I., Chabris, C. F., Chang, E., Chapman, G. B., Dannals, J. E., Goldstein, N. J., Goren, A., Hershfield, H. E., Hirschhorn, S. W., … Duckworth, A. L. (2021). A megastudy of text-based nudges encouraging patients to get vaccinated at an upcoming doctor’s appointment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(20), e2101165118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101165118
⁵Schindler, R. M., & Yalch, R. F. (2006). It seems factual, but is it? Effects of using sharp versus round numbers in advertising claims. Advances in Consumer Research, 33, 586–586.
As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule*
The AI Contradiction Read online I just generated an image in the style of Monet using AI. Have a look, and think about what makes this inferior to a real Monet painting. Made with AI* A few weeks back, X user "SHLOMS" did the same. SHLOM's post on X. 1,300 people responded. Most said this AI art was pure crap.They said it lacked "coherent composition". The colours were an "incoherent muddle". Some said it was "trying too hard". Others called it "obvious AI slop". Replies to "SHLOMS" included...
New and Safe Effect Read online In the early 1970s an ambitious young director released his film THX 1138. The concept went against many of the typical Hollywood storylines at the time. Set in a dystopian future where sex is outlawed and drug-taking is mandatory, the film was wildly different from what audiences were used to. The film was also a massive flop. Despite the a-list cast and big marketing budget, few watched it. The young director was discouraged and almost gave up until he read...
Generation Effect Read online This ad outside my local opticians sticks in my mind. "Blink if you need an eye exam." At first glance, it's bizzare. It doesn't promote the business, showcase a promotion, or entice people in. And yet, I think it's weirdly effective due to the generation effect. In 1978, researchers¹ asked participants to either read work pairs or generate missing words from cues. For example: Read condition: hot → cold Generate condition: hot → c___ Those generating answers...