I've just spent two days traveling from London to Valencia by train.
Over the 48 hours, I saw a lot of crap messaging.
The worst offender = Valencia tram ticket machine.
Look at the image and ask yourself, how do I activate my ticket?
A day later, I discovered it's the big red circle to the left.
I believe that almost every message could be improved by behavioural science.
I've collected six successful messages with BS principles behind them to prove my point.
Anchoring — De Beers
In the 1930s, only 10% of Americans bought diamond engagement rings.
Most spent a smaller proportion of their disposable income on cheaper gems.
So, to break the habit, De Beers came up with a new anchor.
They said, "How can you make two months' salary last forever?".
Hardly anyone spent two months' salary on an engagement ring before this.
But this new anchor shifted perception.
Today, 90% of engagement rings are diamond.
Pratfall Effect — Avis
Rental car company Avis always lagged 2nd for market share behind Hertz.
Most companies would hide this weakness, but Avis embraced it.
Aronson's 1966¹ study found that we like smart people more if they have flaws.
So, Avis took this to heart and flaunted their weakness.
Generation Effect — Gut Check
There's a straightforward way to get someone to notice your ad.
Remove a letter.
In 2020, researchers² showed participants brand names with missing letters.
H_BC, Goo_e, Li_erpool FC, N_dge.
It turns out that participants remember those brand names 14% more than entirely written brands (e.g., HSBC), with a recall rate of 92% versus 81%.
The Gut Foundation applied this to their ads.
They didn't tell drivers to get checked. They advertised 100% "anus beef".
The purposeful typo forced drivers to pay attention.
Keats Heuristic — Tesco
Rhymes are potent messaging tools.
Researchers McGlone and Tofighbakhsh³ showed participants two sets of proverbs.
Some rhymed; e.g. Woes unite foes.
Some didn't rhyme (but meant the same thing); e.g. Woes unite enemies.
The study revealed that rhyming proverbs were deemed 17% more trustworthy and memorable than their non-rhyming counterparts.
Tesco use the same principle to boost sales of its reduced veg.
A message that rhymes is more believable.
Endowment Effect — NHS
If you feel you own something, you'll value it more.
Katy Milkman⁴ applied this to persuasive messaging in her fantastic 2021 study.
Stating "your vaccine is reserved for you" made readers 4.6% more likely to get vaccinated as the reservation language boosts feelings of ownership. The NHS applied this principle to boost uptake of the Covid-19 vaccination.
Don't say it's available, say it's reserved.
Specific Numbers — Forest
In a 2006 study⁵, consumers saw ads for a fictitious deodorant.
Some were told it lasts "exactly 47% longer than rivals"
Others were told it lasts "more than 50% longer than rivals"
Which message do you think worked? It's probably not what you'd expect.
The precise 47% claim was deemed 10% more accurate by 199 participants.
Why? Well, it's the specific number. Specificity enhances the perceived accuracy and trustworthiness of claims.
And Forest applies this brilliantly in their 2024 billboard.
"51,899,782 free minutes" is more persuasive than "lots of free minutes".
Please reply. I read (and respond) to every email you send—that's 192 emails in 2025 if you're counting.
And if you have any Valencia tips, let me know — Phill
¹Aronson, E., Willerman, B., & Floyd, J. (1966). The effect of a pratfall on increasing interpersonal attractiveness. Psychonomic Science, 4(6), 227–228. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03342263
²Shotton, R. (2023). The illusion of choice: 16 ½ psychological biases that influence what we buy. Harriman House.
³McGlone, M. S., & Tofighbakhsh, J. (2000). Birds of a feather flock conjointly (?): Rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychological Science, 11(5), 424–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00282 ⁴Milkman, K. L., Patel, M. S., Gandhi, L., Graci, H. N., Gromet, D. M., Ho, H., Kay, J. S., Lee, T. W., Rothschild, J., Bogard, J. E., Brody, I., Chabris, C. F., Chang, E., Chapman, G. B., Dannals, J. E., Goldstein, N. J., Goren, A., Hershfield, H. E., Hirschhorn, S. W., … Duckworth, A. L. (2021). A megastudy of text-based nudges encouraging patients to get vaccinated at an upcoming doctor’s appointment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(20), e2101165118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101165118
⁵Schindler, R. M., & Yalch, R. F. (2006). It seems factual, but is it? Effects of using sharp versus round numbers in advertising claims. Advances in Consumer Research, 33, 586–586.
As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule*
Operational Transparency Read online Voltarol is the world's number one pain relief gel. Unlike almost every other gel on the market, Voltarol actually works. Clinical tests have been done to prove that the gel penetrates the skin to supply pain relief. And yet, there are dozens of other very successful paom relief creams that don't supply real pain relief. Take Blue-Emu, an over-the-counter cream with $42 million in annual sales. So, why is Blue-Emu successful in a world where Voltarol...
The Ringelmann Effect Read online In 1882, French engineer Maximilien Ringelmann studied effort.¹ He measured how much weight each man could pull. Individually, the men could pull 85 kg. But in groups of seven, they averaged just 65 kg, a 24% drop. This became known as the Ringelmann Effect. Put simply, it proved that as group size increases, individual effort decreases. Most of us will have seen this in the workplace, typically in bloated meetings where nothing gets done. But it's not...
The Effort Illusion Read online In 2003, two researchers¹ proved the illusion of effort. It means we value things more if we believe it took a lot of time to create. Chinander and Schweitzer had groups watch identical presentations. Groups were told one of two things: "This presentation took 8 hours and 34 minutes to prepare." "This presentation took 37 minutes to prepare." Those told the presentation took longer to prep rated it significantly higher. Can I prove this works? On Nudge, I like...
