Six simple 1-min tips to improve any message | Nudge Newsletter


Six 1-Min Tips

Read online


I've just spent two days traveling from London to Valencia by train.

Over the 48 hours, I saw a lot of crap messaging.

The worst offender = Valencia tram ticket machine.

Look at the image and ask yourself, how do I activate my ticket?

I believe that almost every message could be improved by behavioural science.

I've collected six successful messages with BS principles behind them to prove my point.

Anchoring — De Beers

In the 1930s, only 10% of Americans bought diamond engagement rings.

Most spent a smaller proportion of their disposable income on cheaper gems.

So, to break the habit, De Beers came up with a new anchor.

They said, "How can you make two months' salary last forever?".

Hardly anyone spent two months' salary on an engagement ring before this.

But this new anchor shifted perception.

Today, 90% of engagement rings are diamond.

Pratfall Effect — Avis

Rental car company Avis always lagged 2nd for market share behind Hertz.

Most companies would hide this weakness, but Avis embraced it.

Aronson's 1966¹ study found that we like smart people more if they have flaws.

So, Avis took this to heart and flaunted their weakness.

Generation Effect — Gut Check

There's a straightforward way to get someone to notice your ad.

Remove a letter.

In 2020, researchers² showed participants brand names with missing letters.

H_BC, Goo_e, Li_erpool FC, N_dge.

It turns out that participants remember those brand names 14% more than entirely written brands (e.g., HSBC), with a recall rate of 92% versus 81%.

The Gut Foundation applied this to their ads.

They didn't tell drivers to get checked. They advertised 100% "anus beef".

Keats Heuristic — Tesco

Rhymes are potent messaging tools.

Researchers McGlone and Tofighbakhsh³ showed participants two sets of proverbs.

Some rhymed; e.g. Woes unite foes.

Some didn't rhyme (but meant the same thing); e.g. Woes unite enemies.

The study revealed that rhyming proverbs were deemed 17% more trustworthy and memorable than their non-rhyming counterparts.

Tesco use the same principle to boost sales of its reduced veg.

Endowment Effect — NHS

If you feel you own something, you'll value it more.

Katy Milkman⁴ applied this to persuasive messaging in her fantastic 2021 study.

Stating "your vaccine is reserved for you" made readers 4.6% more likely to get vaccinated as the reservation language boosts feelings of ownership.

The NHS applied this principle to boost uptake of the Covid-19 vaccination.

Specific Numbers — Forest

In a 2006 study⁵, consumers saw ads for a fictitious deodorant.

Some were told it lasts "exactly 47% longer than rivals"

Others were told it lasts "more than 50% longer than rivals"

Which message do you think worked? It's probably not what you'd expect.

The precise 47% claim was deemed 10% more accurate by 199 participants.

Why? Well, it's the specific number.

Specificity enhances the perceived accuracy and trustworthiness of claims.

And Forest applies this brilliantly in their 2024 billboard.

Please reply. I read (and respond) to every email you send—that's 192 emails in 2025 if you're counting.

And if you have any Valencia tips, let me knowPhill

¹Aronson, E., Willerman, B., & Floyd, J. (1966). The effect of a pratfall on increasing interpersonal attractiveness. Psychonomic Science, 4(6), 227–228. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03342263

²Shotton, R. (2023). The illusion of choice: 16 ½ psychological biases that influence what we buy. Harriman House.

³McGlone, M. S., & Tofighbakhsh, J. (2000). Birds of a feather flock conjointly (?): Rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychological Science, 11(5), 424–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00282

⁴Milkman, K. L., Patel, M. S., Gandhi, L., Graci, H. N., Gromet, D. M., Ho, H., Kay, J. S., Lee, T. W., Rothschild, J., Bogard, J. E., Brody, I., Chabris, C. F., Chang, E., Chapman, G. B., Dannals, J. E., Goldstein, N. J., Goren, A., Hershfield, H. E., Hirschhorn, S. W., … Duckworth, A. L. (2021). A megastudy of text-based nudges encouraging patients to get vaccinated at an upcoming doctor’s appointment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(20), e2101165118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101165118

⁵Schindler, R. M., & Yalch, R. F. (2006). It seems factual, but is it? Effects of using sharp versus round numbers in advertising claims. Advances in Consumer Research, 33, 586–586.

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule*

Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

The Psychology Of Smell Read online I've got a shameful secret. My mouth salivates when I walk past Subway. I know the food is dire, the lettuce is plastic, and the bread is like a sponge. Yet I can't help but feel an urge to go in. After reading Consumerology¹, I think I've learnt why. The Psychology of Smell You'll smell a Subway before you see it. The yeasty, sweet, toasty smell is pumped out onto the street. And I think it's on purpose. Just looking at this image reminds me of the smell....

Losses Feel Worse Than Gains Read online Kahneman proved that "𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘴 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘭 𝘵𝘸𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘶𝘭 𝘢𝘴 𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘷𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴". So, Nationwide don't say:❌ "We've kept our Holloway store open. So you can keep banking in-person."They say:✅ "Santander is leaving Holloway. Maybe it's time you left Santander." It's the best ad I've seen in weeks because it concretely applies behavioural science. Highlighting what a customer will lose is often more persuasive¹ than highlighting what they'll gain. Richard...

"I'm A Student Here Too" Read online In 1994¹, researchers asked 100s of college students for charitable donations. All were told to interrupt the students and solicit a donation. But there was a twist. Half were told to make a straightforward request, with no extra commentary. Half were told to emphasise a shared identity, saying "I'm a student here too". The results were astonishing. Only 9.8% of students in the control group made a donation. While 47.1% donated in the variant group, a 3x...