I've just spent two days traveling from London to Valencia by train.
Over the 48 hours, I saw a lot of crap messaging.
The worst offender = Valencia tram ticket machine.
Look at the image and ask yourself, how do I activate my ticket?
A day later, I discovered it's the big red circle to the left.
I believe that almost every message could be improved by behavioural science.
I've collected six successful messages with BS principles behind them to prove my point.
Anchoring — De Beers
In the 1930s, only 10% of Americans bought diamond engagement rings.
Most spent a smaller proportion of their disposable income on cheaper gems.
So, to break the habit, De Beers came up with a new anchor.
They said, "How can you make two months' salary last forever?".
Hardly anyone spent two months' salary on an engagement ring before this.
But this new anchor shifted perception.
Today, 90% of engagement rings are diamond.
Pratfall Effect — Avis
Rental car company Avis always lagged 2nd for market share behind Hertz.
Most companies would hide this weakness, but Avis embraced it.
Aronson's 1966¹ study found that we like smart people more if they have flaws.
So, Avis took this to heart and flaunted their weakness.
Generation Effect — Gut Check
There's a straightforward way to get someone to notice your ad.
Remove a letter.
In 2020, researchers² showed participants brand names with missing letters.
H_BC, Goo_e, Li_erpool FC, N_dge.
It turns out that participants remember those brand names 14% more than entirely written brands (e.g., HSBC), with a recall rate of 92% versus 81%.
The Gut Foundation applied this to their ads.
They didn't tell drivers to get checked. They advertised 100% "anus beef".
The purposeful typo forced drivers to pay attention.
Keats Heuristic — Tesco
Rhymes are potent messaging tools.
Researchers McGlone and Tofighbakhsh³ showed participants two sets of proverbs.
Some rhymed; e.g. Woes unite foes.
Some didn't rhyme (but meant the same thing); e.g. Woes unite enemies.
The study revealed that rhyming proverbs were deemed 17% more trustworthy and memorable than their non-rhyming counterparts.
Tesco use the same principle to boost sales of its reduced veg.
A message that rhymes is more believable.
Endowment Effect — NHS
If you feel you own something, you'll value it more.
Katy Milkman⁴ applied this to persuasive messaging in her fantastic 2021 study.
Stating "your vaccine is reserved for you" made readers 4.6% more likely to get vaccinated as the reservation language boosts feelings of ownership. The NHS applied this principle to boost uptake of the Covid-19 vaccination.
Don't say it's available, say it's reserved.
Specific Numbers — Forest
In a 2006 study⁵, consumers saw ads for a fictitious deodorant.
Some were told it lasts "exactly 47% longer than rivals"
Others were told it lasts "more than 50% longer than rivals"
Which message do you think worked? It's probably not what you'd expect.
The precise 47% claim was deemed 10% more accurate by 199 participants.
Why? Well, it's the specific number. Specificity enhances the perceived accuracy and trustworthiness of claims.
And Forest applies this brilliantly in their 2024 billboard.
"51,899,782 free minutes" is more persuasive than "lots of free minutes".
Please reply. I read (and respond) to every email you send—that's 192 emails in 2025 if you're counting.
And if you have any Valencia tips, let me know — Phill
¹Aronson, E., Willerman, B., & Floyd, J. (1966). The effect of a pratfall on increasing interpersonal attractiveness. Psychonomic Science, 4(6), 227–228. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03342263
²Shotton, R. (2023). The illusion of choice: 16 ½ psychological biases that influence what we buy. Harriman House.
³McGlone, M. S., & Tofighbakhsh, J. (2000). Birds of a feather flock conjointly (?): Rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychological Science, 11(5), 424–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00282 ⁴Milkman, K. L., Patel, M. S., Gandhi, L., Graci, H. N., Gromet, D. M., Ho, H., Kay, J. S., Lee, T. W., Rothschild, J., Bogard, J. E., Brody, I., Chabris, C. F., Chang, E., Chapman, G. B., Dannals, J. E., Goldstein, N. J., Goren, A., Hershfield, H. E., Hirschhorn, S. W., … Duckworth, A. L. (2021). A megastudy of text-based nudges encouraging patients to get vaccinated at an upcoming doctor’s appointment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(20), e2101165118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101165118
⁵Schindler, R. M., & Yalch, R. F. (2006). It seems factual, but is it? Effects of using sharp versus round numbers in advertising claims. Advances in Consumer Research, 33, 586–586.
As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule*
Price Transparency Read online I spent far too much time moaning about the price of pints. I'd harp on about the £3 ales I used to buy and how they're £5.50 today. And then I saw this image. Taken from The Times based on figures from Ukospitality and the British Beer and Pub association 13p profit!? Suddenly £5 for a pint seems quite reasonable. And there's evidence to prove this price transparency tactic works. In 2020, Harvard researchers¹ tested the effects of showing a product's...
Humor Effect Read online Are funny ads actually more 𝒎𝒆𝒎𝒐𝒓𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆? That's what seven Californian¹ researchers set out to test in 2014. A group of participants were instructed to remember a long list of words. 50% of the participants then waited for 20 minutes in silence. 🤫50% of the participants then watched a funny 20-minute video. 🤣The researchers asked both groups to recall as many words as possible. Those who sat in silence remembered just 20% of the words. 🤫For those who watched the...
Barnum Effect Read online Why does the ad on the 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 capture attention? Well, it might be down to the question.Rohini Ahluwalia and Robert Burnkrant's study¹ in 2004 tested two types of ads. Statement-based ads: "You haven't had a pear in a while."And... Question ads: "When was the last time you had a pear?" The researchers found that ads using questions are rated 14% 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐟𝐚𝐯𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐲 than statement-based ads. So, why not turn your statement into a question? I tested this myself in two...