A behavioural science masterclass? | Nudge Newsletter


Only One Ingredient

Read online


Popular British supermarket, M&S, launched an eye-catching new product range.

Breakfast cereal, with one to six ingredients, listed plainly on the package.

It's created to compete against the high UPF alternatives¹.

Yet, I think this cereal range will succeed for entirely different reasons.

Show your costs

In 2020, Harvard researchers² tested the effects of showing a product's costs.

Rather than just listing the price, they showed ingredient cost (and profit margin).

Students were 21% more likely to buy the soup when the costs were shown.

Even the profit margin didn't put them off.

Wallets sold with a profit margin of 55% still saw a boost in sales.

Show your ingredients

The Harvard researchers concluded² that showing costs boosts trust.

And that boost in trust makes consumers more likely to buy.

I reckon the M&S cereal will do the same.

In a famously unhealthy category³ where products often contain dozens of unfamiliar ingredients, the "Only" cereal will stand out and garner trust.

And compared to other launches in this highly competitive space, I'd gamble that the cereal should see ~21% more sales.

What do you think?Phill

¹van Tulleken, C. (2023). Ultra-processed people: The science behind food that isn’t food. W.W. Norton & Company.

²Mohan, B., Buell, R. W., & John, L. K. (2020). Lifting the veil: The benefits of cost transparency. Marketing Science, 39(6), 1105–1121.

³BBC News. (2010, April 19). Many cereals ‘have more sugar than desserts’. BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8630446.stm

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule*

Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

Unit Asking Read online Which of these articles encouraged Brits to donate more? It's the one on the right. Research by Christopher Hsee¹ found that donors gave nearly twice as much when first asked to consider the needs of a single person before being asked to donate to a larger cause. This “unit asking” strategy made contributions feel more reasonable and personal. And it explains this² rather bizarre study: The study looked at the success rate of donation requests on the...

Hyperbolic Discounting Read online One of these ads looks 108% better value. Can you guess which? In 2025, Shotton and Flicker¹ tested ads like this in their book. 282 consumers were shown Sierra Nevada Pale Ale priced at $18.99 for 12 bottles. Half were told this equated to $1.58 per bottle. Among those shown the per-bottle price, 28.6% said it was good or very good value (more than double the 13.7% who only saw the total price). Framing the cost at the per-unit level made the purchase feel...

Specific Number Bias Read online Which coaster makes Guinness seem like the ‘𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘦𝘤𝘵 𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘵’? That’s what Schindler¹ (Rutgers University) and Yalch (University of Washington) studied in 2006. They showed participants ads that used specific numbers, for example: “It takes 119.5 seconds to pour the perfect pint.” Vs. rounded numbers: “It takes 2 minutes to pour the perfect pint.” Turns out, claims made using 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐬 are perceived to be 10% 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐯𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞. By pointing out that it takes...