A behavioural science masterclass? | Nudge Newsletter


Only One Ingredient

​Read online​


Popular British supermarket, M&S, launched an eye-catching new product range.

Breakfast cereal, with one to six ingredients, listed plainly on the package.

It's created to compete against the high UPF alternatives¹.

Yet, I think this cereal range will succeed for entirely different reasons.

Show your costs

In 2020, Harvard researchers² tested the effects of showing a product's costs.

Rather than just listing the price, they showed ingredient cost (and profit margin).

Students were 21% more likely to buy the soup when the costs were shown.

Even the profit margin didn't put them off.

Wallets sold with a profit margin of 55% still saw a boost in sales.

Show your ingredients

The Harvard researchers concluded² that showing costs boosts trust.

And that boost in trust makes consumers more likely to buy.

I reckon the M&S cereal will do the same.

In a famously unhealthy category³ where products often contain dozens of unfamiliar ingredients, the "Only" cereal will stand out and garner trust.

And compared to other launches in this highly competitive space, I'd gamble that the cereal should see ~21% more sales.

What do you think? — Phill​

¹van Tulleken, C. (2023). Ultra-processed people: The science behind food that isn’t food. W.W. Norton & Company.

²Mohan, B., Buell, R. W., & John, L. K. (2020). Lifting the veil: The benefits of cost transparency. Marketing Science, 39(6), 1105–1121.

³BBC News. (2010, April 19). Many cereals ‘have more sugar than desserts’. BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8630446.stm

As a behavioural science practitioner, I believe in the peak-end rule*

​Tune into Nudge | Advertise with Nudge | Unsubscribe

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter
Beyond Provocative: How One AI Company's Ad Campaign Betrays Humanity -  Roger Wong

Anchoring Read online In Alex Edmans' great book The Madness of Markets, he writes about how the bookshop Computer Literacy, Inc changed its name. The store, in 1999, became Fatbrain.com. But why? What's wrong with Computer Literacy, Inc? According to Alex Edmans, it was to profit from the dot-com bubble. And it worked. Fatbrain's stock climbed 36% after the name change. A Bloomberg article about the name change. But was the Fatbrain spike in earnings a one-off? To find out, Cooper, Dimitrov...

Mere Exposure Read online In E.T., director Steven Spielberg planned a scene where the alien creature was coaxed out of hiding using sweets. Keen not to miss a profitable opportunity, Spielberg approached Mars to use M&M’s for a small fee. Mars turned Spielberg down. Undeterred, Spielberg asked Hershey’s for product placement. Hershey’s had just launched Reese’s Pieces, so they jumped at the chance to feature the new chocolates on screen. Reese’s Pieces were used to lure out the alien. After...

Concrete Phrases Read online Take a look at this satellite photo. What do you see? Most see a busy Walmart car park. But stock market investors see earnings. RS Metrics sells daily satellite images of parking lots at 44 of the USA’s largest retailers. They photograph 67,000 locations every day (assuming no cloud cover). To a layperson like me, this seems ridiculous. Surely there’s a better metric investors can use to gauge business success? But investors place a high value on these images....