profile

Nudge Newsletter

The rubber chicken that saved Pizza Hut | Nudge Newsletter 🧠

Published 9 months ago • 1 min read

Toy motivation.

In 1994, David Novak was promoted to Pizza Hut CEO.

He wasn’t excited. "It was a graveyard for executives," he said.

"Morale was down, business was down. It needed energy injected into the business.”

The solution? A rubber chicken.

Novak handed out a mini rubber chicken toy (and a relatively small cash bonus) to hundreds of high-performing employees.

The tiny gift had a dramatic impact.

"This took off like you wouldn't believe it helped turned around the mindset of the organization and we started working together with the franchisees and turned around the quality in three years. And the franchisees were now giving us ideas," he told CNN.

Rubber chickens were handed out on planned visits to honour exceptional employees, but they were often awarded spontaneously to staff who went above and beyond.

Yet, it wasn’t just cash and a chick, he also wrote a personal note explaining why they deserved the reward.

“You have to be very specific with what the person has tangibly done and how it is contributing to the success of the organization. It has to be purposeful."

David Novak and his team tie this seemingly small gesture to a dramatic turnaround in the company’s fortunes.

Market cap increased from $4.6 billion to $31 billion. Employee turnover dropped and staff satisfaction rose.

Walk into Novak’s office in 2016 and you would see every inch of every wall covered in pictures of those who received the rubber chicken.

He handed out 1,400 toys in his 22 year tenure and turned the company around.

The behavioural science literature can help breakdown why this small intervention was so significant.

Variable rewards: We’re more motivated by variable benefits than consistent ones (B.F. Skinner, 1938). Spontaneous toys and cash motivate more than a yearly bonus.

Reciprocity: We need to return a favour (Cialdini 1984). Staff feel indebted to a CEO who’s hung their photo on his office wall.

Input bias: We value communication more if we see the effort behind it (Chinander and Schweitzer, 2003). It’s not just a gift and some cash, it’s a handwritten note from the busy boss. The effort makes staff appreciate the gesture more.

A rubber chicken, a $100 bill and a scribbled note won’t transform your business.

But it won’t hurt.

We shouldn’t undervalue these seemingly insignificant gestures as the scientific literature suggests they dramatically outweigh the effort they take.

Cheers!

Phill

Nudge Newsletter

Phill Agnew

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

Operational Transparency Read online Voltarol is the world's number one pain relief gel. Unlike almost every other gel on the market, Voltarol actually works. Clinical tests have been done to prove that the gel penetrates the skin to supply pain relief. And yet, there are dozens of other very successful paom relief creams that don't supply real pain relief. Take Blue-Emu, an over-the-counter cream with $42 million in annual sales. So, why is Blue-Emu successful in a world where Voltarol...

4 days ago • 1 min read

The Ringelmann Effect Read online In 1882, French engineer Maximilien Ringelmann studied effort.Âą He measured how much weight each man could pull. Individually, the men could pull 85 kg. But in groups of seven, they averaged just 65 kg, a 24% drop. This became known as the Ringelmann Effect. Put simply, it proved that as group size increases, individual effort decreases. Most of us will have seen this in the workplace, typically in bloated meetings where nothing gets done. But it's not...

11 days ago • 1 min read

The Effort Illusion Read online In 2003, two researchersÂą proved the illusion of effort. It means we value things more if we believe it took a lot of time to create. Chinander and Schweitzer had groups watch identical presentations. Groups were told one of two things: "This presentation took 8 hours and 34 minutes to prepare." "This presentation took 37 minutes to prepare." Those told the presentation took longer to prep rated it significantly higher. Can I prove this works? On Nudge, I like...

18 days ago • 1 min read