profile

Nudge Newsletter

The rubber chicken that saved Pizza Hut | Nudge Newsletter 🧠

Published about 1 year ago • 1 min read

Toy motivation.

In 1994, David Novak was promoted to Pizza Hut CEO.

He wasn’t excited. "It was a graveyard for executives," he said.

"Morale was down, business was down. It needed energy injected into the business.”

The solution? A rubber chicken.

Novak handed out a mini rubber chicken toy (and a relatively small cash bonus) to hundreds of high-performing employees.

The tiny gift had a dramatic impact.

"This took off like you wouldn't believe it helped turned around the mindset of the organization and we started working together with the franchisees and turned around the quality in three years. And the franchisees were now giving us ideas," he told CNN.

Rubber chickens were handed out on planned visits to honour exceptional employees, but they were often awarded spontaneously to staff who went above and beyond.

Yet, it wasn’t just cash and a chick, he also wrote a personal note explaining why they deserved the reward.

“You have to be very specific with what the person has tangibly done and how it is contributing to the success of the organization. It has to be purposeful."

David Novak and his team tie this seemingly small gesture to a dramatic turnaround in the company’s fortunes.

Market cap increased from $4.6 billion to $31 billion. Employee turnover dropped and staff satisfaction rose.

Walk into Novak’s office in 2016 and you would see every inch of every wall covered in pictures of those who received the rubber chicken.

He handed out 1,400 toys in his 22 year tenure and turned the company around.

The behavioural science literature can help breakdown why this small intervention was so significant.

Variable rewards: We’re more motivated by variable benefits than consistent ones (B.F. Skinner, 1938). Spontaneous toys and cash motivate more than a yearly bonus.

Reciprocity: We need to return a favour (Cialdini 1984). Staff feel indebted to a CEO who’s hung their photo on his office wall.

Input bias: We value communication more if we see the effort behind it (Chinander and Schweitzer, 2003). It’s not just a gift and some cash, it’s a handwritten note from the busy boss. The effort makes staff appreciate the gesture more.

A rubber chicken, a $100 bill and a scribbled note won’t transform your business.

But it won’t hurt.

We shouldn’t undervalue these seemingly insignificant gestures as the scientific literature suggests they dramatically outweigh the effort they take.

Cheers!

Phill

Nudge Newsletter

Phill Agnew

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

The Country-of-Origin Effect Read online You’re thinking of buying a new pair of running shoes. Usually, you go with Nike. But this time, you’re considering Umbro (a lesser-known brand). Then you find out: Umbro makes their shoes in the UK. Nice. It's always good to find locally made brands. You’re willing to pay a decent price. But the next day, you hear Umbro are moving production to South Korea. Now, would you still pay the same? Probably not. That’s exactly what these researchers¹ found....

5 days ago • 1 min read

The Anchoring Effect Read online In the 1970s, Tversky and Kahneman¹ ran a simple experiment. They asked people: "What percentage of African countries are in the UN?" But before answering, participants had to spin a wheel with numbers from 0 to 100. The wheel was rigged to land on either 10 or 65. Then came the important question: "Is the actual percentage higher or lower than that number?" After that, participants gave their best estimate. Here’s what happened: People who saw 10 guessed 25%...

12 days ago • 1 min read

The Illusion of Choice Read online Give people $1 and two identical packs of gum. Same flavour. Same price. What happens? Most people aren't interested. That’s what Kim, Novemsky, and Dhar¹ found in a South Korean experiment. They gave participants ₩1,000 and two gum options, both priced at ₩630. Only 46% bought anything. But then they did something clever. They made the prices slightly different: ₩620 vs. ₩640. Now 77% decided to buy. Same gum. Slight price difference. Big impact. Why? When...

19 days ago • 1 min read