The rubber chicken that saved Pizza Hut | Nudge Newsletter đź§ 


Toy motivation.

In 1994, David Novak was promoted to Pizza Hut CEO.

He wasn’t excited. "It was a graveyard for executives," he said.

"Morale was down, business was down. It needed energy injected into the business.”

The solution? A rubber chicken.

Novak handed out a mini rubber chicken toy (and a relatively small cash bonus) to hundreds of high-performing employees.

The tiny gift had a dramatic impact.

"This took off like you wouldn't believe it helped turned around the mindset of the organization and we started working together with the franchisees and turned around the quality in three years. And the franchisees were now giving us ideas," he told CNN.

Rubber chickens were handed out on planned visits to honour exceptional employees, but they were often awarded spontaneously to staff who went above and beyond.

Yet, it wasn’t just cash and a chick, he also wrote a personal note explaining why they deserved the reward.

“You have to be very specific with what the person has tangibly done and how it is contributing to the success of the organization. It has to be purposeful."

David Novak and his team tie this seemingly small gesture to a dramatic turnaround in the company’s fortunes.

Market cap increased from $4.6 billion to $31 billion. Employee turnover dropped and staff satisfaction rose.

Walk into Novak’s office in 2016 and you would see every inch of every wall covered in pictures of those who received the rubber chicken.

He handed out 1,400 toys in his 22 year tenure and turned the company around.

The behavioural science literature can help breakdown why this small intervention was so significant.

Variable rewards: We’re more motivated by variable benefits than consistent ones (B.F. Skinner, 1938). Spontaneous toys and cash motivate more than a yearly bonus.

Reciprocity: We need to return a favour (Cialdini 1984). Staff feel indebted to a CEO who’s hung their photo on his office wall.

Input bias: We value communication more if we see the effort behind it (Chinander and Schweitzer, 2003). It’s not just a gift and some cash, it’s a handwritten note from the busy boss. The effort makes staff appreciate the gesture more.

A rubber chicken, a $100 bill and a scribbled note won’t transform your business.

But it won’t hurt.

We shouldn’t undervalue these seemingly insignificant gestures as the scientific literature suggests they dramatically outweigh the effort they take.

Cheers!

Phill

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

The Halo Effect Read online The World Cup is here, and England's kit looks a bit naff. Cole Palmer wearing a shirt that looks 2x too big. The kit seems ill-fitting; it looks far too baggy around the shoulders, and the neck is too wide. If Nike surveyed my opinion for their market research, I'd give it a 1/5. But my opinion could change very soon. Success shifts perception. In 2019, researcher Gerd NuferÂą asked 3,178 football fans to rank the quality of their club's kits. For the study, six...

Specific Number Bias Read online I stumbled across this Reddit post a few weeks back. Everest surveyors added two feet to their measurement to appear accurate. Rather than listing the exact measurement of 29,000, the British Royal Geographical Society declared Mount Everest's elevation at 29,002. Clearly, the surveyors thought that rounded numbers seem less believable. Something that numerous studies have since proven. Can You Spare 17 Cents? In 1994, Santos, Leve and Pratkanis asked three...

The AI Contradiction Read online I just generated an image in the style of Monet using AI. Have a look, and think about what makes this inferior to a real Monet painting. Made with AI* A few weeks back, X user "SHLOMS" did the same. SHLOM's post on X. 1,300 people responded. Most said this AI art was pure crap.They said it lacked "coherent composition". The colours were an "incoherent muddle". Some said it was "trying too hard". Others called it "obvious AI slop". Replies to "SHLOMS" included...