profile

Nudge Newsletter

Only 7,319 of you will receive this email | Nudge Newsletter 🧠

Published over 1 year ago • 1 min read

Bowles' bowl cajole.

In the runup to Prince Charles' and Camilla Parker Bowles' April 2005 wedding, souvenir sales were disappointingly low.

Shops from London to Windsor reported sluggish sales of tea towels, coffee mugs, and commemorative bowls.

The British public wasn't fussed.

But then overnight, demand changed.

Suddenly, sales sky-rocketed, with Brits cleaning out shops and buying up all available stock.

Did Brits suddenly change their opinions? No, the date changed.

Due to Pope John Paul's funeral, the wedding date was pushed from the 8th of April to the 9th, resulting in lots of incorrectly dated souvenirs.

Parker-Bowles's bowl sales were driven by pure scarcity.

According to Steve Martin in his latest book Influence at Work:

Several journalists already in Windsor to cover the royal event asked shoppers leaving stores with bags of souvenirs whether they were supporters of the royal family. Most said no. The motivation to purchase royal mementoes had little to do with the royal wedding. They simply thought that the misdated items would be rarer and, consequently, worth more in the future.

Scarce resources drive sales.

They turn uninterested Brits into shelf-clearing customers.

In one study, wholesale beef buyers more than doubled their orders after being informed that a shortage of Australian beef was likely due to forecasted bad weather.

The opportunity is clear.

If there's something about your proposal that's genuinely rare or exclusive, make it as prominent as possible.

Cheers!

Phill

Nudge Newsletter

Phill Agnew

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

The AI Contradiction Read online I just generated an image in the style of Monet using AI. Have a look, and think about what makes this inferior to a real Monet painting. Made with AI* A few weeks back, X user "SHLOMS" did the same. SHLOM's post on X. 1,300 people responded. Most said this AI art was pure crap.They said it lacked "coherent composition". The colours were an "incoherent muddle". Some said it was "trying too hard". Others called it "obvious AI slop". Replies to "SHLOMS" included...

about 7 hours ago • 2 min read

New and Safe Effect Read online In the early 1970s an ambitious young director released his film THX 1138. The concept went against many of the typical Hollywood storylines at the time. Set in a dystopian future where sex is outlawed and drug-taking is mandatory, the film was wildly different from what audiences were used to. The film was also a massive flop. Despite the a-list cast and big marketing budget, few watched it. The young director was discouraged and almost gave up until he read...

7 days ago • 2 min read

Generation Effect Read online This ad outside my local opticians sticks in my mind. "Blink if you need an eye exam." At first glance, it's bizzare. It doesn't promote the business, showcase a promotion, or entice people in. And yet, I think it's weirdly effective due to the generation effect. In 1978, researchers¹ asked participants to either read work pairs or generate missing words from cues. For example: Read condition: hot → cold Generate condition: hot → c___ Those generating answers...

14 days ago • 1 min read