Bowles' bowl cajole.

In the runup to Prince Charles' and Camilla Parker Bowles' April 2005 wedding, souvenir sales were disappointingly low.

Shops from London to Windsor reported sluggish sales of tea towels, coffee mugs, and commemorative bowls.

The British public wasn't fussed.

But then overnight, demand changed.

Suddenly, sales sky-rocketed, with Brits cleaning out shops and buying up all available stock.

Did Brits suddenly change their opinions? No, the date changed.

At time of writing, this plate is available to buy for £49.95. Scarcity still drives demand.

Due to Pope John Paul's funeral, the wedding date was pushed from the 8th of April to the 9th, resulting in lots of incorrectly dated souvenirs.

Parker-Bowles's bowl sales were driven by pure scarcity.

According to Steve Martin in his latest book Influence at Work:

Several journalists already in Windsor to cover the royal event asked shoppers leaving stores with bags of souvenirs whether they were supporters of the royal family. Most said no. The motivation to purchase royal mementoes had little to do with the royal wedding. They simply thought that the misdated items would be rarer and, consequently, worth more in the future.

Scarce resources drive sales.

They turn uninterested Brits into shelf-clearing customers.

In one study, wholesale beef buyers more than doubled their orders after being informed that a shortage of Australian beef was likely due to forecasted bad weather.

The opportunity is clear.

If there's something about your proposal that's genuinely rare or exclusive, make it as prominent as possible.

Cheers!

Phill

- Tune into Nudge

- Advertise on the newsletter

- Check out my course

Unsubscribe

How “Made In X” changes what we pay | Nudge Newsletter

The Country-of-Origin Effect Read online You’re thinking of buying a new pair of running shoes. Usually, you go with Nike. But this time, you’re considering Umbro (a lesser-known brand). Then you find out: Umbro makes their shoes in the UK. Nice. It's always good to find locally made brands. You’re willing to pay a decent price. But the next day, you hear Umbro are moving production to South Korea. Now, would you still pay the same? Probably not. That’s exactly what these researchers¹ found....

3 days ago • 1 min read

The random number that changed people’s answers by 80% | Nudge Newsletter

The Anchoring Effect Read online In the 1970s, Tversky and Kahneman¹ ran a simple experiment. They asked people: "What percentage of African countries are in the UN?" But before answering, participants had to spin a wheel with numbers from 0 to 100. The wheel was rigged to land on either 10 or 65. Then came the important question: "Is the actual percentage higher or lower than that number?" After that, participants gave their best estimate. Here’s what happened: People who saw 10 guessed 25%...

10 days ago • 1 min read

The small pricing tweak that boosted purchases from 46% to 77% | Nudge Newsletter

The Illusion of Choice Read online Give people $1 and two identical packs of gum. Same flavour. Same price. What happens? Most people aren't interested. That’s what Kim, Novemsky, and Dhar¹ found in a South Korean experiment. They gave participants ₩1,000 and two gum options, both priced at ₩630. Only 46% bought anything. But then they did something clever. They made the prices slightly different: ₩620 vs. ₩640. Now 77% decided to buy. Same gum. Slight price difference. Big impact. Why? When...

17 days ago • 1 min read