My problem with KFC's viral ad | Nudge Newsletter đź§ 


KFC or ZFC?

This KFC ad is much-praised online. Yet, I think it's misguided.

By promoting imitation fried chicken shops, I think KFC is doing something they might regret.

To explain, I need to share a study.

Titled: To be in Vogue, the researchers analyzed adverts from years in Vogue magazine for this study.

The researchers wanted to see if middle-brow fashion brands could raise their prices if they competed with high-end brands like Gucci.

In other words, is the Halo Effect so powerful that placing your ad next to Gucci’s could boost your status?

Their study concluded that yes, it does.

Simply placing a middle-brow brand’s ad next to a high-end one increased the perceived status of that brand and the willingness to pay.

I couldn't stop thinking about this study.

So, I decided to test it myself.

My experiment (which some may remember) was simple.

I contacted 100 Brits using Google Surveys.

I asked the group a simple question, “Would you listen to this podcast?”, and I included a picture of the Nudge logo.

However, I added a twist.

Half of the participants saw the Nudge logo on a blue background.

The other half saw the logo, but this time, you could see the faint, dimmed logos of other popular podcasts in the background.

My results matched the study's findings. Being pictured next to popular peers made Brits almost 3x more likely to listen.

Which brings me back to the KFC ad.

My problem with this ad is it's giving the imitation brands the halo effect benefits that my podcast received.

WFC, RFC, XFC and the rest will be seen as more credible by being associated with KFC.

If the study results hold, then customers should be more willing to try the imitation brands, which is surely not what KFC hoped.

All too often, ads that seem smart in the boardroom fail in the real world, and I reckon this might be one of them.

But what do you think? Reply and let me know.

Finally, big thanks to today’s sponsor, Planable.

Time for a social media tool you actually like

​Planable is the content collaboration platform that makes marketing teamwork a breeze. For real.

  • Create content for 9 social networks, your blog, newsletters, and campaign briefs — literally all your content.
  • It looks & feels like the native platforms, so it’s instantly familiar.
  • You can give and get straightforward feedback, right next to the post.
  • Plan months ahead with a super easy, visual calendar.
  • Set dedicated approval flows for each client or brand.
  • Schedule Posts, Stories, Reels, Carousels, TikToks, LinkedIn PDFs — you name it!

Plus AI-empowered creation, easy approvals, insightful analytics, and more. What’s not to love?

Cheers!

Phill

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

Operational Transparency Read online Voltarol is the world's number one pain relief gel. Unlike almost every other gel on the market, Voltarol actually works. Clinical tests have been done to prove that the gel penetrates the skin to supply pain relief. And yet, there are dozens of other very successful paom relief creams that don't supply real pain relief. Take Blue-Emu, an over-the-counter cream with $42 million in annual sales. So, why is Blue-Emu successful in a world where Voltarol...

The Ringelmann Effect Read online In 1882, French engineer Maximilien Ringelmann studied effort.Âą He measured how much weight each man could pull. Individually, the men could pull 85 kg. But in groups of seven, they averaged just 65 kg, a 24% drop. This became known as the Ringelmann Effect. Put simply, it proved that as group size increases, individual effort decreases. Most of us will have seen this in the workplace, typically in bloated meetings where nothing gets done. But it's not...

The Effort Illusion Read online In 2003, two researchersÂą proved the illusion of effort. It means we value things more if we believe it took a lot of time to create. Chinander and Schweitzer had groups watch identical presentations. Groups were told one of two things: "This presentation took 8 hours and 34 minutes to prepare." "This presentation took 37 minutes to prepare." Those told the presentation took longer to prep rated it significantly higher. Can I prove this works? On Nudge, I like...