My problem with KFC's viral ad | Nudge Newsletter đź§ 


KFC or ZFC?

This KFC ad is much-praised online. Yet, I think it's misguided.

By promoting imitation fried chicken shops, I think KFC is doing something they might regret.

To explain, I need to share a study.

Titled: To be in Vogue, the researchers analyzed adverts from years in Vogue magazine for this study.

The researchers wanted to see if middle-brow fashion brands could raise their prices if they competed with high-end brands like Gucci.

In other words, is the Halo Effect so powerful that placing your ad next to Gucci’s could boost your status?

Their study concluded that yes, it does.

Simply placing a middle-brow brand’s ad next to a high-end one increased the perceived status of that brand and the willingness to pay.

I couldn't stop thinking about this study.

So, I decided to test it myself.

My experiment (which some may remember) was simple.

I contacted 100 Brits using Google Surveys.

I asked the group a simple question, “Would you listen to this podcast?”, and I included a picture of the Nudge logo.

However, I added a twist.

Half of the participants saw the Nudge logo on a blue background.

The other half saw the logo, but this time, you could see the faint, dimmed logos of other popular podcasts in the background.

My results matched the study's findings. Being pictured next to popular peers made Brits almost 3x more likely to listen.

Which brings me back to the KFC ad.

My problem with this ad is it's giving the imitation brands the halo effect benefits that my podcast received.

WFC, RFC, XFC and the rest will be seen as more credible by being associated with KFC.

If the study results hold, then customers should be more willing to try the imitation brands, which is surely not what KFC hoped.

All too often, ads that seem smart in the boardroom fail in the real world, and I reckon this might be one of them.

But what do you think? Reply and let me know.

Finally, big thanks to today’s sponsor, Planable.

Time for a social media tool you actually like

​Planable is the content collaboration platform that makes marketing teamwork a breeze. For real.

  • Create content for 9 social networks, your blog, newsletters, and campaign briefs — literally all your content.
  • It looks & feels like the native platforms, so it’s instantly familiar.
  • You can give and get straightforward feedback, right next to the post.
  • Plan months ahead with a super easy, visual calendar.
  • Set dedicated approval flows for each client or brand.
  • Schedule Posts, Stories, Reels, Carousels, TikToks, LinkedIn PDFs — you name it!

Plus AI-empowered creation, easy approvals, insightful analytics, and more. What’s not to love?

Cheers!

Phill

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter
Beyond Provocative: How One AI Company's Ad Campaign Betrays Humanity -  Roger Wong

Anchoring Read online In Alex Edmans' great book The Madness of Markets, he writes about how the bookshop Computer Literacy, Inc changed its name. The store, in 1999, became Fatbrain.com. But why? What's wrong with Computer Literacy, Inc? According to Alex Edmans, it was to profit from the dot-com bubble. And it worked. Fatbrain's stock climbed 36% after the name change. A Bloomberg article about the name change. But was the Fatbrain spike in earnings a one-off? To find out, Cooper, Dimitrov...

Mere Exposure Read online In E.T., director Steven Spielberg planned a scene where the alien creature was coaxed out of hiding using sweets. Keen not to miss a profitable opportunity, Spielberg approached Mars to use M&M’s for a small fee. Mars turned Spielberg down. Undeterred, Spielberg asked Hershey’s for product placement. Hershey’s had just launched Reese’s Pieces, so they jumped at the chance to feature the new chocolates on screen. Reese’s Pieces were used to lure out the alien. After...

Concrete Phrases Read online Take a look at this satellite photo. What do you see? Most see a busy Walmart car park. But stock market investors see earnings. RS Metrics sells daily satellite images of parking lots at 44 of the USA’s largest retailers. They photograph 67,000 locations every day (assuming no cloud cover). To a layperson like me, this seems ridiculous. Surely there’s a better metric investors can use to gauge business success? But investors place a high value on these images....