My problem with KFC's viral ad | Nudge Newsletter 🧠


KFC or ZFC?

This KFC ad is much-praised online. Yet, I think it's misguided.

By promoting imitation fried chicken shops, I think KFC is doing something they might regret.

To explain, I need to share a study.

Titled: To be in Vogue, the researchers analyzed adverts from years in Vogue magazine for this study.

The researchers wanted to see if middle-brow fashion brands could raise their prices if they competed with high-end brands like Gucci.

In other words, is the Halo Effect so powerful that placing your ad next to Gucci’s could boost your status?

Their study concluded that yes, it does.

Simply placing a middle-brow brand’s ad next to a high-end one increased the perceived status of that brand and the willingness to pay.

I couldn't stop thinking about this study.

So, I decided to test it myself.

My experiment (which some may remember) was simple.

I contacted 100 Brits using Google Surveys.

I asked the group a simple question, β€œWould you listen to this podcast?”, and I included a picture of the Nudge logo.

However, I added a twist.

Half of the participants saw the Nudge logo on a blue background.

The other half saw the logo, but this time, you could see the faint, dimmed logos of other popular podcasts in the background.

My results matched the study's findings. Being pictured next to popular peers made Brits almost 3x more likely to listen.

Which brings me back to the KFC ad.

My problem with this ad is it's giving the imitation brands the halo effect benefits that my podcast received.

WFC, RFC, XFC and the rest will be seen as more credible by being associated with KFC.

If the study results hold, then customers should be more willing to try the imitation brands, which is surely not what KFC hoped.

All too often, ads that seem smart in the boardroom fail in the real world, and I reckon this might be one of them.

But what do you think? Reply and let me know.

Finally, big thanks to today’s sponsor, Planable.

Time for a social media tool you actually like

​Planable is the content collaboration platform that makes marketing teamwork a breeze. For real.

  • Create content for 9 social networks, your blog, newsletters, and campaign briefs β€” literally all your content.
  • It looks & feels like the native platforms, so it’s instantly familiar.
  • You can give and get straightforward feedback, right next to the post.
  • Plan months ahead with a super easy, visual calendar.
  • Set dedicated approval flows for each client or brand.
  • Schedule Posts, Stories, Reels, Carousels, TikToks, LinkedIn PDFs β€” you name it!

Plus AI-empowered creation, easy approvals, insightful analytics, and more. What’s not to love?

Cheers!

Phill

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

Input Bias Read online Does the 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭 put into a shop display 𝘒𝘀𝘡𝘢𝘒𝘭𝘭𝘺 influence sales? That's what MoralesΒΉ set out to answer in 2005. Participants were shown round the same store, except half saw the shelves 𝐧𝐞𝐚𝐭π₯𝐲 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐀𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐒𝐭𝐑 𝐑𝐒𝐠𝐑-𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐝𝐒𝐬𝐩π₯𝐚𝐲𝐬. The other participants saw the same products, but with a π₯𝐨𝐰-𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐝𝐒𝐬𝐩π₯𝐚𝐲. The results are striking. Those who saw the high-effort display were willing to pay 24.4% π’Žπ’π’“π’†. After seeing a store display like Boots, customers were willing to pay...

Concrete Phrases Read online Which electric bus would stick in your mind? It's not even a competition. Copy that's easy to visualise is easy to memorise. In 2021, Richard ShottonΒΉ showed participants a number of vague phrases, like 'innovative quality', and then some concrete phrases, e.g., 'money in your pocket'. Shotton’s concrete phrases were 8.6x more likely to be remembered. Richard Shotton's Concrete Phrases Study He’d proved the concrete phrases' effect, a phenomenon first discovered...

Psychology of Pricing Read online 1) Charm Pricing for High-Quality Products Imagine you’re buying a shatterproof iPhone case Does it matter if it is priced at Β£49.99 or Β£49.95? Well, yes. Apple uses charm pricing but usually ends prices with a 5. Gendall, Fox, and Wilton (1998)ΒΉ ran an experiment with fast-moving consumer goods (fly spray, cheese) and durables (electric kettles). They found that prices with endings in 99 cents are more attractive for low-priced, fast-moving consumer goods...