My problem with KFC's viral ad | Nudge Newsletter đź§ 


KFC or ZFC?

This KFC ad is much-praised online. Yet, I think it's misguided.

By promoting imitation fried chicken shops, I think KFC is doing something they might regret.

To explain, I need to share a study.

Titled: To be in Vogue, the researchers analyzed adverts from years in Vogue magazine for this study.

The researchers wanted to see if middle-brow fashion brands could raise their prices if they competed with high-end brands like Gucci.

In other words, is the Halo Effect so powerful that placing your ad next to Gucci’s could boost your status?

Their study concluded that yes, it does.

Simply placing a middle-brow brand’s ad next to a high-end one increased the perceived status of that brand and the willingness to pay.

I couldn't stop thinking about this study.

So, I decided to test it myself.

My experiment (which some may remember) was simple.

I contacted 100 Brits using Google Surveys.

I asked the group a simple question, “Would you listen to this podcast?”, and I included a picture of the Nudge logo.

However, I added a twist.

Half of the participants saw the Nudge logo on a blue background.

The other half saw the logo, but this time, you could see the faint, dimmed logos of other popular podcasts in the background.

My results matched the study's findings. Being pictured next to popular peers made Brits almost 3x more likely to listen.

Which brings me back to the KFC ad.

My problem with this ad is it's giving the imitation brands the halo effect benefits that my podcast received.

WFC, RFC, XFC and the rest will be seen as more credible by being associated with KFC.

If the study results hold, then customers should be more willing to try the imitation brands, which is surely not what KFC hoped.

All too often, ads that seem smart in the boardroom fail in the real world, and I reckon this might be one of them.

But what do you think? Reply and let me know.

Finally, big thanks to today’s sponsor, Planable.

Time for a social media tool you actually like

​Planable is the content collaboration platform that makes marketing teamwork a breeze. For real.

  • Create content for 9 social networks, your blog, newsletters, and campaign briefs — literally all your content.
  • It looks & feels like the native platforms, so it’s instantly familiar.
  • You can give and get straightforward feedback, right next to the post.
  • Plan months ahead with a super easy, visual calendar.
  • Set dedicated approval flows for each client or brand.
  • Schedule Posts, Stories, Reels, Carousels, TikToks, LinkedIn PDFs — you name it!

Plus AI-empowered creation, easy approvals, insightful analytics, and more. What’s not to love?

Cheers!

Phill

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

The Framing Effect Read online "Does your kid have a ten-dollar head?" That's what Bell Helmets asked parents in this newspaper ad. It seems like a strange question until we understand the power of framing. Let's look at a study on beer to explain. In a study led by Donald LichtensteinÂą from Colorado University, bar menus with descending price order increased average beer sales by 4%. Framing the menu with high-priced options first made the mid-range prices seem like a better deal. Sales for...

The Mere Exposure Effect Read online Loyal fans of Nudge will have heard me talk about the mere exposure effect. In 1969, psychologist Robert ZajoncÂą found that students rated unfamiliar Turkish words more favourably when they had seen them more often. It's not a revolutionary finding. We prefer things we're familiar with. And many great inventors knew this instinctively. Edison and the electric light bulb Thomas Edison understood that while the lightbulb was revolutionary, new inventions...

Specific Goals > Unspecific Goals Read online Unspecific goals don't work. Psychologists¹ Locke and Latham proved it. In 1975, the two researchers set up a real-world experiment at a logging company. Drivers were only loading trucks to 60% capacity. For the control, all staff members were given an unspecific goal: Unspecific goal = “Do your best.” Performance did not increase. The researchers then asked staff what a hard but fair goal would be. They said 94%. That became their new specific...