It's the best ad I've seen this year | Nudge Newsletter 🧠


"We'd be Β£11m richer."

Take a look at this ad.

It's jam-packed with behavioural science principles designed to persuade Londoners to use the product.

Let's break it down.

"10 minutes free daily."

We're drawn to free things. The difference between a chocolate that costs 1 cent and 0 cents is dramatic. The free version increases purchase intention by 69% (*Ariely, 2008).

"Β£11 million richer by now"

Rory Sutherland said, "The meaning and significance attached to something is in direct proportion to the expense with which it is communicated."

Sharing that Forest has sacrificed Β£11 million to deliver their offer will make potential buyers value the offer moreβ€”that's costly signalling.

"51,889,782 free minutes"

Ads with specific numbers are deemed 10% more accurate and believable (Schindler and Yalch 2006).

"Forest's goal is to make zero emission travel affordable."

Luxury fashion brands who agree to donate to charity on your behalf if you buy generate more sales (Strahilevitz, 1998). It's due to the Noble Edge Effect.

When companies demonstrate genuine social responsibility, consumers reward them with increased respect, which in turn leads to greater profits.

"Here's 100 free mins"

The bike beneath the ad isn't available for use. When users try to scan the code, they'll see this.

We love variable rewards like this.

Shen (2015) found that participants were 62% more likely to complete a task if the rewards they received were variable and unpredictable.

Surprises like this from Forest will make potential customers more likely to sign up.


It's a cracking ad, and it's given me an idea.

In a few weeks, I'll watch 300 TV ads from the past twenty years, review each one, and determine how many use behavioural science principles like this.

That'll be a future episode of Nudge, out on December 2nd.

To make sure you don't miss it, subscribe to Nudge wherever you get your pods.

Cheers,

Phill

*Yep, I'm aware that Ariely's a risky researcher to cite these days. Watch this to learn why. But this experiment hasn't been questioned, and the findings are backed by dozens of other studies.

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

Input Bias Read online Does the 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭 put into a shop display 𝘒𝘀𝘡𝘢𝘒𝘭𝘭𝘺 influence sales? That's what MoralesΒΉ set out to answer in 2005. Participants were shown round the same store, except half saw the shelves 𝐧𝐞𝐚𝐭π₯𝐲 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐀𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐒𝐭𝐑 𝐑𝐒𝐠𝐑-𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐝𝐒𝐬𝐩π₯𝐚𝐲𝐬. The other participants saw the same products, but with a π₯𝐨𝐰-𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐝𝐒𝐬𝐩π₯𝐚𝐲. The results are striking. Those who saw the high-effort display were willing to pay 24.4% π’Žπ’π’“π’†. After seeing a store display like Boots, customers were willing to pay...

Concrete Phrases Read online Which electric bus would stick in your mind? It's not even a competition. Copy that's easy to visualise is easy to memorise. In 2021, Richard ShottonΒΉ showed participants a number of vague phrases, like 'innovative quality', and then some concrete phrases, e.g., 'money in your pocket'. Shotton’s concrete phrases were 8.6x more likely to be remembered. Richard Shotton's Concrete Phrases Study He’d proved the concrete phrases' effect, a phenomenon first discovered...

Psychology of Pricing Read online 1) Charm Pricing for High-Quality Products Imagine you’re buying a shatterproof iPhone case Does it matter if it is priced at Β£49.99 or Β£49.95? Well, yes. Apple uses charm pricing but usually ends prices with a 5. Gendall, Fox, and Wilton (1998)ΒΉ ran an experiment with fast-moving consumer goods (fly spray, cheese) and durables (electric kettles). They found that prices with endings in 99 cents are more attractive for low-priced, fast-moving consumer goods...