profile

Nudge Newsletter

It's the best ad I've seen this year | Nudge Newsletter 🧠

Published 11 months ago • 1 min read

"We'd be £11m richer."

Take a look at this ad.

It's jam-packed with behavioural science principles designed to persuade Londoners to use the product.

Let's break it down.

"10 minutes free daily."

We're drawn to free things. The difference between a chocolate that costs 1 cent and 0 cents is dramatic. The free version increases purchase intention by 69% (*Ariely, 2008).

"£11 million richer by now"

Rory Sutherland said, "The meaning and significance attached to something is in direct proportion to the expense with which it is communicated."

Sharing that Forest has sacrificed £11 million to deliver their offer will make potential buyers value the offer more—that's costly signalling.

"51,889,782 free minutes"

Ads with specific numbers are deemed 10% more accurate and believable (Schindler and Yalch 2006).

"Forest's goal is to make zero emission travel affordable."

Luxury fashion brands who agree to donate to charity on your behalf if you buy generate more sales (Strahilevitz, 1998). It's due to the Noble Edge Effect.

When companies demonstrate genuine social responsibility, consumers reward them with increased respect, which in turn leads to greater profits.

"Here's 100 free mins"

The bike beneath the ad isn't available for use. When users try to scan the code, they'll see this.

We love variable rewards like this.

Shen (2015) found that participants were 62% more likely to complete a task if the rewards they received were variable and unpredictable.

Surprises like this from Forest will make potential customers more likely to sign up.

It's a cracking ad, and it's given me an idea.

In a few weeks, I'll watch 300 TV ads from the past twenty years, review each one, and determine how many use behavioural science principles like this.

That'll be a future episode of Nudge, out on December 2nd.

To make sure you don't miss it, subscribe to Nudge wherever you get your pods.

Cheers,

Phill

*Yep, I'm aware that Ariely's a risky researcher to cite these days. Watch this to learn why. But this experiment hasn't been questioned, and the findings are backed by dozens of other studies.

Nudge Newsletter

Phill Agnew

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

Operational Transparency Read online Voltarol is the world's number one pain relief gel. Unlike almost every other gel on the market, Voltarol actually works. Clinical tests have been done to prove that the gel penetrates the skin to supply pain relief. And yet, there are dozens of other very successful paom relief creams that don't supply real pain relief. Take Blue-Emu, an over-the-counter cream with $42 million in annual sales. So, why is Blue-Emu successful in a world where Voltarol...

7 days ago • 1 min read

The Ringelmann Effect Read online In 1882, French engineer Maximilien Ringelmann studied effort.¹ He measured how much weight each man could pull. Individually, the men could pull 85 kg. But in groups of seven, they averaged just 65 kg, a 24% drop. This became known as the Ringelmann Effect. Put simply, it proved that as group size increases, individual effort decreases. Most of us will have seen this in the workplace, typically in bloated meetings where nothing gets done. But it's not...

14 days ago • 1 min read

The Effort Illusion Read online In 2003, two researchers¹ proved the illusion of effort. It means we value things more if we believe it took a lot of time to create. Chinander and Schweitzer had groups watch identical presentations. Groups were told one of two things: "This presentation took 8 hours and 34 minutes to prepare." "This presentation took 37 minutes to prepare." Those told the presentation took longer to prep rated it significantly higher. Can I prove this works? On Nudge, I like...

21 days ago • 1 min read