It's the best ad I've seen this year | Nudge Newsletter ๐Ÿง 


"We'd be ยฃ11m richer."

Take a look at this ad.

It's jam-packed with behavioural science principles designed to persuade Londoners to use the product.

Let's break it down.

"10 minutes free daily."

We're drawn to free things. The difference between a chocolate that costs 1 cent and 0 cents is dramatic. The free version increases purchase intention by 69% (*Ariely, 2008).

"ยฃ11 million richer by now"

Rory Sutherland said, "The meaning and significance attached to something is in direct proportion to the expense with which it is communicated."

Sharing that Forest has sacrificed ยฃ11 million to deliver their offer will make potential buyers value the offer moreโ€”that's costly signalling.

"51,889,782 free minutes"

Ads with specific numbers are deemed 10% more accurate and believable (Schindler and Yalch 2006).

"Forest's goal is to make zero emission travel affordable."

Luxury fashion brands who agree to donate to charity on your behalf if you buy generate more sales (Strahilevitz, 1998). It's due to the Noble Edge Effect.

When companies demonstrate genuine social responsibility, consumers reward them with increased respect, which in turn leads to greater profits.

"Here's 100 free mins"

The bike beneath the ad isn't available for use. When users try to scan the code, they'll see this.

We love variable rewards like this.

Shen (2015) found that participants were 62% more likely to complete a task if the rewards they received were variable and unpredictable.

Surprises like this from Forest will make potential customers more likely to sign up.


It's a cracking ad, and it's given me an idea.

In a few weeks, I'll watch 300 TV ads from the past twenty years, review each one, and determine how many use behavioural science principles like this.

That'll be a future episode of Nudge, out on December 2nd.

To make sure you don't miss it, subscribe to Nudge wherever you get your pods.

Cheers,

Phill

*Yep, I'm aware that Ariely's a risky researcher to cite these days. Watch this to learn why. But this experiment hasn't been questioned, and the findings are backed by dozens of other studies.

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

Hyperbolic Discounting Read online One of these ads looks 108% better value. Can you guess which? In 2025, Shotton and Flickerยน tested ads like this in their book. 282 consumers were shown Sierra Nevada Pale Ale priced at $18.99 for 12 bottles. Half were told this equated to $1.58 per bottle. Among those shown the per-bottle price, 28.6% said it was good or very good value (more than double the 13.7% who only saw the total price). Framing the cost at the per-unit level made the purchase feel...

Specific Number Bias Read online Which coaster makes Guinness seem like the โ€˜๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ง๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ต ๐˜ฑ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ตโ€™? Thatโ€™s what Schindlerยน (Rutgers University) and Yalch (University of Washington) studied in 2006. They showed participants ads that used specific numbers, for example: โ€œIt takes 119.5 seconds to pour the perfect pint.โ€ Vs. rounded numbers: โ€œIt takes 2 minutes to pour the perfect pint.โ€ Turns out, claims made using ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ž๐œ๐ข๐Ÿ๐ข๐œ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ฆ๐›๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ are perceived to be 10% ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ž ๐›๐ž๐ฅ๐ข๐ž๐ฏ๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž. By pointing out that it takes...

The Framing Effect Read online Your perception is shaped by framing. Reference how lean a steak is, and you'll boost perceptions of quality.ยน Politicians know this. Pollster Frank Luntzยฒ reports that 68% of people oppose inheritance tax if it's labelled "estate tax," but the figure jumps to 78% when it's called a "death tax." And yet most marketers forget this. We talk about our products and services in unimaginative ways. At bookshops, marketers promote the top "picks this summer". This...