It's the best ad I've seen this year | Nudge Newsletter 🧠


"We'd be £11m richer."

Take a look at this ad.

It's jam-packed with behavioural science principles designed to persuade Londoners to use the product.

Let's break it down.

"10 minutes free daily."

We're drawn to free things. The difference between a chocolate that costs 1 cent and 0 cents is dramatic. The free version increases purchase intention by 69% (*Ariely, 2008).

"£11 million richer by now"

Rory Sutherland said, "The meaning and significance attached to something is in direct proportion to the expense with which it is communicated."

Sharing that Forest has sacrificed £11 million to deliver their offer will make potential buyers value the offer more—that's costly signalling.

"51,889,782 free minutes"

Ads with specific numbers are deemed 10% more accurate and believable (Schindler and Yalch 2006).

"Forest's goal is to make zero emission travel affordable."

Luxury fashion brands who agree to donate to charity on your behalf if you buy generate more sales (Strahilevitz, 1998). It's due to the Noble Edge Effect.

When companies demonstrate genuine social responsibility, consumers reward them with increased respect, which in turn leads to greater profits.

"Here's 100 free mins"

The bike beneath the ad isn't available for use. When users try to scan the code, they'll see this.

We love variable rewards like this.

Shen (2015) found that participants were 62% more likely to complete a task if the rewards they received were variable and unpredictable.

Surprises like this from Forest will make potential customers more likely to sign up.


It's a cracking ad, and it's given me an idea.

In a few weeks, I'll watch 300 TV ads from the past twenty years, review each one, and determine how many use behavioural science principles like this.

That'll be a future episode of Nudge, out on December 2nd.

To make sure you don't miss it, subscribe to Nudge wherever you get your pods.

Cheers,

Phill

*Yep, I'm aware that Ariely's a risky researcher to cite these days. Watch this to learn why. But this experiment hasn't been questioned, and the findings are backed by dozens of other studies.

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

Long-Term Goals = Success? Read online You've probably heard of the “Yale Goal Study". Here's the study. In 1953, researchers interviewed Yale’s graduating class. They asked a simple question: “Have you written down your goals for life?” Twenty years later, they tracked the same students down. And discovered something dramatic. Just 3% had written specific goals. And that 3% had built more personal wealth than the other 97% combined. It’s a perfect self-help story, with a simple lesson. Make...

Commitment Devices Read online Often we plan to do something and don't. Donating blood, going on a run, watching that webinar. We want to, but forget. This drives marketers insane. People sign up for their events—but no one comes. Katy Milkman, a brilliant professor at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, found a solution¹. She used a commitment device. Milkman and her colleagues teamed up with a large American utility firm to see if they could prompt more of the company's...

Incentives: Do they work? Read online I've been critical of incentives in the past, citing examples where they backfire. But this¹ incredible 2016 study altered my opinion. Across 63 schools, 10,649 pupils in their final year of GCSEs took part in an experiment. The schools in the study. The students were split into three groups: Control group: these students received no financial incentives Financial rewards: would receive to £320 for attendance, behaviour, classwork and homework...