Handwritten triumphs.

It's safe to say I'm obsessed with Rory Sutherland's Nudgestock talk.

He shares this surprising house-buying tactic.

This family of 5 wanted to buy a house in Chesterfield.

So, they wrote a handwritten letter to the 25 houses on their street.

This strange, ineffective tactic probably won't work, right?

No.

8 people responded.

5 people offered viewings

4 people gave them offers.

1 sold them their house.

And yet, 0 previously had their homes on the market.

This handwritten letter was an extraordinarily effective act of persuasion.

"It works", according to Rory "precisely because of the effort invested in the communication. The effectiveness of the communication was driven by the fact it was handwritten."

People value communication more if the communication requires more effort to create.

There's evidence to back this up.

Three researchers working with a South Korean beauty store found that handwritten thank-you notes for customers increased future spending by nearly 2x.

And yet, so few companies and individuals use this.

We assume the best approach is the most efficient approach.

We base our tactics on impressions and eyeballs but rarely consider the smaller tactics that have asymmetric benefits.

All too often, effortful narrow communication beats effortless broad communication.

Cheers,

Phill

P.S. Sorry I didn't put this in a handwritten letter.

- Tune into Nudge

- Advertise on the newsletter

- Check out my course

Unsubscribe

How “Made In X” changes what we pay | Nudge Newsletter

The Country-of-Origin Effect Read online You’re thinking of buying a new pair of running shoes. Usually, you go with Nike. But this time, you’re considering Umbro (a lesser-known brand). Then you find out: Umbro makes their shoes in the UK. Nice. It's always good to find locally made brands. You’re willing to pay a decent price. But the next day, you hear Umbro are moving production to South Korea. Now, would you still pay the same? Probably not. That’s exactly what these researchers¹ found....

7 days ago • 1 min read

The random number that changed people’s answers by 80% | Nudge Newsletter

The Anchoring Effect Read online In the 1970s, Tversky and Kahneman¹ ran a simple experiment. They asked people: "What percentage of African countries are in the UN?" But before answering, participants had to spin a wheel with numbers from 0 to 100. The wheel was rigged to land on either 10 or 65. Then came the important question: "Is the actual percentage higher or lower than that number?" After that, participants gave their best estimate. Here’s what happened: People who saw 10 guessed 25%...

14 days ago • 1 min read

The small pricing tweak that boosted purchases from 46% to 77% | Nudge Newsletter

The Illusion of Choice Read online Give people $1 and two identical packs of gum. Same flavour. Same price. What happens? Most people aren't interested. That’s what Kim, Novemsky, and Dhar¹ found in a South Korean experiment. They gave participants ₩1,000 and two gum options, both priced at ₩630. Only 46% bought anything. But then they did something clever. They made the prices slightly different: ₩620 vs. ₩640. Now 77% decided to buy. Same gum. Slight price difference. Big impact. Why? When...

21 days ago • 1 min read