Always show your working | Nudge Newsletter ๐Ÿง 


State the work you've done.

I promoted Nudge in two Reddit ads.

One version highlighted what you'd learn by listening:

  • "Learn 6 memorable marketing lessons"

The other version showed the effort I put into the show:

  • โ€Iโ€™ve spent 480 minutes spent listening to expertsโ€

Stating the work I'd put into the show worked.

The labour illusion ad saw a 45% higher click-through rate compared to the control version.

Why?

Because we value things more when we see the effort that's gone in.

โ€‹

Have you tried this? Hit reply and let me know.

Cheers,

Phill

Nudge Newsletter

I spend 18 hours each week turning marketing psychology into readable newsletters.

Read more from Nudge Newsletter

Unit Asking Read online Which of these articles encouraged Brits to donate more? It's the one on the right. Research by Christopher Hseeยน found that donors gave nearly twice as much when first asked to consider the needs of a single person before being asked to donate to a larger cause. This โ€œunit askingโ€ strategy made contributions feel more reasonable and personal. And it explains thisยฒ rather bizarre study: The study looked at the success rate of donation requests on the...

Hyperbolic Discounting Read online One of these ads looks 108% better value. Can you guess which? In 2025, Shotton and Flickerยน tested ads like this in their book. 282 consumers were shown Sierra Nevada Pale Ale priced at $18.99 for 12 bottles. Half were told this equated to $1.58 per bottle. Among those shown the per-bottle price, 28.6% said it was good or very good value (more than double the 13.7% who only saw the total price). Framing the cost at the per-unit level made the purchase feel...

Specific Number Bias Read online Which coaster makes Guinness seem like the โ€˜๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ง๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ต ๐˜ฑ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ตโ€™? Thatโ€™s what Schindlerยน (Rutgers University) and Yalch (University of Washington) studied in 2006. They showed participants ads that used specific numbers, for example: โ€œIt takes 119.5 seconds to pour the perfect pint.โ€ Vs. rounded numbers: โ€œIt takes 2 minutes to pour the perfect pint.โ€ Turns out, claims made using ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ž๐œ๐ข๐Ÿ๐ข๐œ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ฆ๐›๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ are perceived to be 10% ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ž ๐›๐ž๐ฅ๐ข๐ž๐ฏ๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž. By pointing out that it takes...